On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Wilco Dijkstra
> wrote:
>> These are just a few ideas to start. What do people think? I'd welcome
>> discussion
>> and other proposals for similar improvements.
>
> What about the default behavior if no o
s
list of demangled names.
Just guessing, though :)
Regards,
Kevin André
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 16:49, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Daniel Marjamäki writes:
>
>> Do you have any opinion about adding a warning for:
>>
>> int f(char c)
>> {
>> return 10 * (c == 13) ? 1 : 2;
>> }
>> As far as I see the multiplication doesn't exist in the gimple format
>> (looking at a
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 17:55, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 7:22 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>> From the perspective of gcc, I think the goal of clang->gcc would be to
>>> replace the current frontends entirely.
>>
>> Ye
