RE: Add STB_SECONDARY to gABI

2012-05-14 Thread Lowell, Randy
This looks good. I just want to check one thing with you. In point 5 you state that unresolved secondary symbols have a zero value. Are you implying that unresolved secondary symbols should not result in a link or load-time error? If that's the case, you should also make it clear that a second

RE: Add STB_SECONDARY to gABI

2012-05-14 Thread Lowell, Randy
eference is handled individually, so we don't need to say anything about precedence of conflicting undefs. So I agree with the suggestion to delete difference #5 and add the "otherwise matches STB_WEAK" statement. Randy > > -- > Supra > > > -Original Message

RE: Add STB_SECONDARY to gABI

2012-06-28 Thread Lowell, Randy
This looks good. I just have one wordsmithing comment. I would have listed the STB_SECONDARY differences in a different order -- maybe (3 1 2 4). That puts the most general difference first, and it matches the order used for the description of STB_WEAK. Randy > -Original Message- >