Re: [PATCH] BIT_FIELD_REF_UNSIGNED considered harmful

On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, 13:47:36 +0100, Diego Novillo wrote: > On 03/05/08 07:18, Richard Guenther wrote: > > >Comments? > > Makes sense to me. > > >+ if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (t)) > >+ && (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (t)) > >+ != TREE_INT_CST_LOW (TREE_OP

Re: [RFC] Adjust output for strings in tree-pretty-print.c

Hi there, On Mon, 19 May 2008, 15:59:16 +0200, FX wrote: > [...] > Any comments? Is it OK to commit as is? this may sound like nit-picking, but the length of a string cannot be negative, so, I'd rather make the new parameter `len' an "unsigned int" or even size_t. HTH, cheers. l8er manfred

Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!

t; > a "gmake bubblestrap" will not run into problems. > > > > I suspect the commit that broken gfortran is > > > > 2005-07-22 Manfred Hollstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > * tree-ssa-structalias.c (merge_graph_nodes): Fix uninitiali

Re: _GLOBAL_ query

Hi there, On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, 11:35:56 +0100, Inder wrote: > Hi All > > I have a query regarding __GLOBAL_ prefixed symbols. > while compiling the testcase given below produces > a symbol '_GLOBAL__I_main', which according to the defination of > static global initiallization should be a global