License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
Copyright (C) 2004,2005 Mathieu Lacage
Author: Mathieu Lacage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*/
#ifndef DWARF2_ABBREV_H
#define DWARF2_ABBREV_H
#i
hi,
I am looking into implementing a new instrumentation pass in gcc
called a "globalizer" and I would be really grateful for feedback
on whether or not such a pass could be considered for inclusion
(from a purely technical perspective).
1) Rationale
I work on network simulation too
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 16:52 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> I think this would be a great feature to have, even if it did only work with
> simple globals and couldn't handle TLS.
>
> Disclaimer: I haven't thought it through thoroughly yet :) Nor am I sure
> whether the better solution might not be
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 17:34 +0200, mathieu lacage wrote:
> Another solution would be to do something like this:
>
> extern void *magic_function (void *variable_uid);
>
> static int a;
> void foo (void)
> {
> void *ptr = magic_function (&a);
> int *p
hi,
I am trying to write an inter-procedural SSA-based pass: all the
existing (in trunk) IPA passes seem to be running on a non-ssa
representation and I have been unable to figure out how to hack passes.c
to make it schedule an inter-procedural pass right after ssa
construction or after the end of
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 11:24 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> John Regehr writes:
>
> >> I would only be worried for cases where no warning is issued *and*
> >> unitialized accesses are eliminated.
> >
> > Yeah, it would be excellent if GCC maintained the invariant that for
> > all uses of uninitialized
comments below,
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:05 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I've put a project proposal for split stacks on the wiki at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SplitStacks . The idea is to permit the stack
> of a single thread to be split into discontiguous segments, thus
> permitting many mor
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:54 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > It would be totally awesome to do this if you could provide an option to
> > delegate to a user-provided function the allocation and deallocation of
> > the stack blobs needed by threads.
>
> Yes, this would be a goal.
The main reaso
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:54 +1100, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Can you give some indication of how the subset is enforced?
I find it weird that you choose to ignore the obvious: code reviews,
maintainer management, etc. Just like what you (gcc developers) do in
gcc's C codebase everyday. Unless, of co
hi,
Since the cvs version of gas supports extensions for the dwarf2
basic_block location information, I thought I could try to add support
to gcc for this feature. My use of this feature is related to binary
code analysis: being able to gather the bb boundaries through gcc's
debugging output
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 21:30 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:19:45PM +0100, mathieu lacage wrote:
> > While the debugging output looks quite correct at -O0, the -O2 output
> > seems broken:
> > :
> > 0: 8d 4c 24 04 l
Here is an updated version with a few bugs fixed (How I managed to
introduce bugs in a 20-liner patch still eludes me).
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 21:26 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:24:47PM -0800, Jim Wilson wrote:
> > mathieu lacage wrote:
> > >Clea
hi,
Daniel Berlin wrote:
I discovered this when deep hacking into the symbol code of GDB a while
ago. Apparently, some people enjoy breakpointing symbols by using the
fully mangled name, which appears (nowadays) mainly in the minsym table.
This sort of hack is often used to work around what
hi mark,
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 21:33 -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I'm not saying that having two different formats is necessarily a bad
> thing (we've already got Tree and RTL, so we're really talking about two
> levels or three), or that switching to LLVM is a bad idea, but I don't
> think ther
14 matches
Mail list logo
