On 1/9/20 5:28 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> I have been able to rescue or reconstruct from patches the following
> prehisoric GCC releases
Great job. This is important
>
> gcc-0.9
> gcc-1.21
> gcc-1.22
> gcc-1.25
> gcc-1.26
> gcc-1.27
> gcc-1.28
> gcc-1.35
>
> gcc-1.36
> gcc-1.37.1
> gcc-1.38
> gcc
Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/10/2010 12:39 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
Why do you say the effective type is different?
The object type is uint8_t, but accessed as uint32_t. That is
undefined.
Unless uint8_t is a character type, as I understand it. That
Nick Stoughton wrote:
Herb is C++ ...
The C1x timetable has us finishing the draft for an initial ballot this
summer (the April Florence meeting being the last chance to submit new
material). The best expert I know on the type based aliasing stuff is
Clark Nelson at Intel (clark.nel...@intel.com
Erik Trulsson wrote:
Moreover I think you are misinterpreting 6.5 clause 7 (which I concede is
fairly easy since it is not quite as unambiguous as one could wish).
I believe that paragraph should not be interpreted as automatically allowing
all accesses that correspond to one of the sorts listed.
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Joshua Haberman wrote:
... elision by patrick of part of a quote of 6.5 Expressions #7...
* an aggregate or union type that includes one of the aforementioned
types among its members (including, recursively, a member of a
subaggr
