On 2024-08-02 07:18, Faiz Syed wrote:
Hello,
Can you remove my email(jojomanz...@gmail.com) from your mailing list?
I no
longer need the announcement emails when a new GCC comes out
Hi,
You can do that yourself. See:
https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-announce
Towards the bottom, there
I was reading the GCC 14 porting to page and I noticed:
Alternatively, projects using using Autoconf could enable
AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS.
"using using" should be "using".
I read over the rest and didn't notice anything else wrong.
Thanks,
Peter D.
5 Jan 2024 5:00:03 pm LIU Hao :
在 2024/1/5 21:44, Peter0x44 via Gcc 写道:
Since you mentioned windows 7 specifically, some of the suggestions
aren't really appropriate. I don't believe msys2 supports windows 7
anymore.
Nobody mentioned Windows 7... maybe you mistook the que
Since you mentioned windows 7 specifically, some of the suggestions
aren't really appropriate. I don't believe msys2 supports windows 7
anymore.
I'm also not the biggest fan of msys2, I think it brings in way too much
complexity for what it is. It's useful if you would like to obtain some
har
On 2023-11-01 23:13, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023, peter0x44 via Gcc wrote:
Why is #define used instead of typedef? I can't imagine how this could
possibly break any existing code.
That's how stdbool.h is specified up to C17. In C23, bool is a keyword
instead.
I see
Recently, I was writing some code, and noticed some slightly strange
warning formatting on a function taking a `bool` parameter
#include
void test(bool unused)
{
}
bruh.c: In function 'test':
bruh.c:2:16: warning: unused parameter 'unused' [-Wunused-parameter]
2 | void test(bool unused)
There is this paragraph in ABOUT-GCC_NLS:
By and large, only diagnostic messages have been internationalized.
Some work remains in other areas; for example, GCC does not yet allow
non-ASCII letters in identifiers.
It seems like this hasn't been true since GCC 10. I can see in release
notes:
Hi,
So, recently I learned about the c99 feature to get NULL pointer checks
for array function arguments.
I have really never seen this feature used in an actual codebase. It's
definitely something I wanted on a few occasions.
To be clear, I'm talking about specifically:
void foo(int array
Hi,
After reading some of this discussion, I figured I should add my own support
for this proposal. It seems to me very few (none?) of the people arguing
against this change actually have a "horse in the race", and instead are
appealing to some theoretical ancient legacy code maintainer who is b
