On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:28:58PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
the function names make no sense - they should be talking about
host-wide-ints, because that is what
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
I'll give it a few more days for the conversation to settle, so I know
what I should do between:
- the barely modified patch you accepted,
- the check asked by Jakub,
- the
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
[It looks like I missed hitting the send button on this response]
Seems to be one instruction shorter at least ;-) Yes, there can be much
worse regressions than that because of the patch (like 40
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Looks like this broke SPU build, since spu_machine_dependent_reorg
accesses -loop_depth. According to comments in the code, this
was done because of concerns that loop_father
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:46:05PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
Well, we're waiting for someone to break the tie ... I'd go with the original
patch, improving the backends where necessary.
E.g. i?86/x86_64 with just
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12-08-15 07:59 , Richard Guenther wrote:
(gdb) call debug_tree (*expr_p)
integer_cst 0x7695d7c0 type integer_type 0x767fa5e8 int
constant 9
(gdb) call debug_tree (0x767fa5e8)
Cannot resolve function debug_tree to any
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:15:03PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
Ok. That would still leave us with the issue Ramana brought up - the
target hook returning true unconditionally if a generic permute is
implemented.
We
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:36:54PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:15:03PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
Ok. That would
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
This implements a new C++ hash table.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg00711.html for
details.
Diego.
Now as we see the result I'd have prefered a more C++-way instead
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Like the following, only the coverage.c use is converted. I've never
seen template function arguments anywhere and having to repeat them all
over the place is really really ugly (yes, even
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:25 PM, paul_kon...@dell.com wrote:
Where does one go to report issues with ISL?
Since GCC doesn't build without it, I'm trying to install ISL from sources.
That doesn't work. It accepts --with-gmp but there is nothing in the
Makefile to pay attention to that --
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
On 8/13/12, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Increment/decrement operations did not exist, please do not add
them at this point.
Note that I have also added +=, -= and *= operations. Having them
has three advantages. First
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Patch aims to fix instability introduced by first scheduler on x86. In
particular it targets following list:
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46843
[2]
This adds verification code that we do not try to rewrite a symbol
into SSA form that is already partly in SSA form. That would lead
to silent wrong-code generation.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2012-08-14 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
This patch tried to use non-clearing memory allocation where possible.
This is especially important for very large
pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-08-14 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa-pre.c (do_regular_insertion): Use a VEC
indexed by pred edge index for avail.
(do_partial_partial_insertion): Likewise.
(insert_into_preds_of_block): Adjust
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Checking overhead in dominance.c gives measurable compile time
increases on a set of cc1-i files. Most of the checking should be done
only with non-release checks enabled.
Bootstrappedtested on
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Verifying loop fathers now passes on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Also speed up fix_loop_structure by requiring DOM_OK so that fast DOM
queries are available.
Bootstrappedtested on
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
Accessing loop_depth (bb-loop_father) isn't very expensive. The
following removes the duplicate info in basic-blocks which is not
properly kept up-to-date at the moment.
Looks like this broke SPU build, since
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
If SPU md reorg would like to look at loop structures it should
compute them. Simply call flow_loops_find, which hopefully works
in CFG RTL mode (which I think
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
This adds verification code that we do not try to rewrite a symbol
into SSA form that is already partly in SSA form. That would lead
to silent wrong-code generation.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Ick
.
2012-08-14 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR bootstrap/54138
* configure.ac: Re-organize ISL / CLOOG checks to allow
disabling with either --without-isl or --without-cloog.
* configure: Regenerated.
* config/cloog.m4: Adjust.
* config/isl.m4
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Passing function arguments in HW registers.
The main problem here is that backward copy propagation phase (aka
combine instructions) can
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:40:42PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com
wrote:
2
constant parts
(beware of endian and odd alignment issues) by means of simply
inserting more entries into the hashtable. Not sure if
offsetted .LC references are valid as result of force_const_mem
though (well, we could try to share the part at offset zero).
Thanks,
Richard.
2012-08-14 Richard
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
This implements constant pool entry sharing for CONST_VECTORs with the
same bit-pattern by canonicalizing them to the same-sized mode with
the least number of elements. Ideally we would be able to hash and
compare the in-memory representation
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Elmar Krieger el...@cmbi.ru.nl wrote:
Hi Ian, hi Richard, hi Andi!
Many thanks for your comments.
The slowdown is not the same with other files, so I'm essentially sure
that this specific source file has some 'feature' that catches GCC at
the wrong leg.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
wrote:
Lots of test cases fail with the attached patch.
Lots still fail after correcting the verifier :-)
920723-1.c: In function 'f':
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
wrote:
Lots of test cases fail with the attached patch
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Steven
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder why we cache loop-depth at all ... given that it is a simple
dereference bb-loop_father-superloops-base.prefix.num
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch tried to use non-clearing memory allocation where possible.
This is especially important for very large functions, when arrays of
size in the order of n_basic_blocks or num_ssa_names are allocated
/pad-10.c FAILs, because appearantly whatever is
responsible for not issueing padding nops is confused by the
no longer occuring coalescing at out-of-SSA time. Thus clearly
a pre-existing bug and simply a weak testcase.
Applied.
Richard.
2012-08-13 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
I will be sending 6 patches that implement all the changes we
have been making on the cxx-conversion branch. As described in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-08/msg00015.html, these patches
change the default bootstrap
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
This implements the double_int rewrite.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg00711.html for
details.
Diego.
I am taking it as a chance to ask a couple
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
this patch detects permutations of permutations and merges them. It also
canonicalizes permutations a bit more.
There are several issues with this patch:
1) I am not sure we
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
John Regehr discovered a couple of spots in GCC sources that invoke
undefined behavior during bootstrap/regtest, the following patch fixes most
of them. I couldn't reproduce the diagnostic.c failure and would like to
Accessing loop_depth (bb-loop_father) isn't very expensive. The
following removes the duplicate info in basic-blocks which is not
properly kept up-to-date at the moment.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2012-08-13 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, committed.
Richard.
2012-08-13 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-cfg.c (print_loop): Avoid ICEing for loops marked for
removal and loops with multiple latches.
Index: gcc/tree-cfg.c
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
1) I am not sure we always want to combine permutations
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
I guess people will complain soon enough if this causes horrible performance
regressions in vectorized code.
Not having looked at your patch in great detail,. surely what we don't
want is a situation
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
I'll have to retest this patch tomorrow (although I don't expect the
modified code is ever called), for some reason the testsuite took twice as
long as usual to run and showed some weird stuff tonight.
There
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
my prevoius LTO cleanup run into problem with plugin enabled builds;
lto-plugin is stupid enought to confused symtab_nodes section with symtab
because it ignores the suffixes.
Err, I suppose we should fix the plugin as
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12-08-09 09:20 , Richard Guenther wrote:
if (interm_type)
{
/* Create a type conversion HALF_TYPE-INTERM_TYPE. */
! tmp = create_tmp_reg (interm_type, NULL);
! new_oprnd = make_ssa_name
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Jan Hubicka wrote:
This converts most users of create_tmp_{var,reg} to use anonymous
SSA names. To give you one more reason to look at 6/6 ;)
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Very cool. Thanks for the hard work. Did you have time
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/09/2012 03:06 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
+ unsigned old_len = name_to_id ? VEC_length (unsigned, name_to_id) :
0;
+
Bootstrap regtest in progress.
Richard.
2012-08-10 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-cfg.c (dump_function_to_file): Make sure to dump
anonymous SSA names when there are no local decls.
Index: gcc/tree-cfg.c
This fixes an error I introduced when making the VECTOR_CST representation
changes.
Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-08-10 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR middle-end/54219
* fold-const.c (fold_ternary_loc): Do not reverse
and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2012-08-10 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/54109
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c
(forward_propagate_addr_into_variable_array_index): Remove.
(forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Adjust
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Elmar Krieger el...@cmbi.ru.nl writes:
The slowdown is not the same with other files, so I'm essentially sure
that this specific source file has some 'feature' that catches GCC at
the wrong leg. This raises my hopes that
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William J. Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Greetings,
Thanks for the review of part 2! Here's another chunk of the SLSR code
(I feel I owe you a few beers at this point). This performs analysis
and
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/08/2012 07:19 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I was suggesting to for example register a 2nd mdreorg-like pass and
add a 2nd target hook. regstack should get the same treatment.
If the mechanism is a proliferation of
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
On 8/8/12, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 7, 2012 Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
We should probably think about naming conventions for mutating
operations, as I expect we will want them
-Original Message-
From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:12 PM
To: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; ubiz...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH,i386] fma,fma4 and xop flags
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:31 PM
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 12-08-08 17:25 , Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Aha, so it is an ordering issue, e.g. declarations being generated
after they have been seen used in an instantiation.
We might want to consider including the header file
Another set of small changes.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-08-09 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree.h (SSA_VAR_P): Simplify.
* tree-ssanames.c (make_ssa_name_fn): Strengthen assert.
* fold-const.c (fold_comparison
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
But now with doing it in stages you end up with (this) first stage
that complicates
gengtype to support a very small subset of C++ types
This fixes PR54027, VRP treating overflow in signed left-shifts undefined.
Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-08-09 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/54027
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_binary_expr_1): Merge
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
I've always found it silly that in order to change the current
function one has to call push_cfun and pop_cfun which conveniently set
and restore the value of cfun and in addition to that also set
current_function_decl
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Elmar Krieger el...@cmbi.ru.nl wrote:
Dear all,
while I fully understand that GCC's steadily advancing optimization
capabilities can't be 'for free', the latest versions have become almost
unusably slow for me:
With simple optimization -O, compiling a certain
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Miles Bader mi...@gnu.org wrote:
Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net writes:
Constructors are allowed, but PODs are often passed more efficiently.
That property seemed particularly important for double_int.
Show us the difference in timing. Show us the generated
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
On 8/7/12, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
Convert double_int from a struct with function into a class with
operators and methods
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
+ static double_int make (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT cst);
+ static double_int make (HOST_WIDE_INT cst);
+ static double_int make (unsigned int cst);
+ static double_int make
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Nick Clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi DJ,
I am applying the following patch to the gcc mainline as an obvious
fix for the following problem building the RL78 backend:
gcc/config/rl78/rl78.c:151:3: error: 'PASS_POS_INSERT_BEFORE' undeclared
here
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:02 AM, nick clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
Err - you are inside the compiler and should not use plugin stuff to
register your machine dependent pass.
Umm, OK, what is the correct method for registering target specific passes ?
(Ones that need to run
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:31 PM, ganesh.gopalasubraman...@amd.com wrote:
Hello,
Bdver2 cpu supports both fma and fma4 instructions.
Previous to patch, option -mno-xop removes -mfma4.
Similarly, option -mno-fma4 removes -mxop.
Eh? Why's that? I think we should disentangle -mxop and -mfma4
,max_decl_uid + num_ssa_names] for decls
in its bitmap. Eventually this pass will get rewritten by Micha anyway
who has pending patches to make va_arg survive until after inlining.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2012-08-08 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
...
Bootstrap regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-08-08 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa-operands.h (virtual_operand_p): Declare.
* tree-ssa-operands.c (virtual_operand_p): New predicate.
* gimple.c (is_gimple_reg): Use
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Nick Clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi DJ,
I am applying the following patch to the gcc mainline
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think we really want that (machine dependent passes). It seems
we cannot get away with it (so we have mdreorg). Allowing (some
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:40:57PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com writes:
[...]
The following program, when compiled with -O0 -g3 (x86_64
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
I've had this flagged to look at later for quite long now...
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 07:34:24AM +, Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
wrote:
Hi,
This is related to pr45605.C test.
Reduced testcase
struct
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
Convert double_int from a struct with function into a class with
operators and methods.
This patch adds the methods and operators. In general functions of
the form double_int_whatever become member functions whatever or,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In the test case for PR54146, compute_global_livein allocates/frees a
worklist for 400,000 basic blocks on each invocation. And it's called
a lot, for rewrite_into_loop_closed_ssa. But the maximum number of
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
In the test case for PR54146
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Another optimization would be to do
@@ -440,13 +442,13 @@ compute_global_livein (bitmap livein ATT
! bitmap_bit_p
, applied.
Richard.
2012-08-07 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* gimple.h (gimple_phi_set_result): Adjust SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT.
* tree-phinodes.c (make_phi_node): Allow a NULL var.
* tree-into-ssa.c (insert_phi_nodes_for): Simplify.
* tree-complex.c
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
So I wonder why simply looping over all SSA defs in a loop body and checking
whether a use is outside of it is not enough to compute
;
frame.i = D.1234;
}
and D.1234 being a candidate for a register.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-08-07 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-into-ssa.c (rewrite_stmt): Remove clobbers for variables
we rewrite into SSA form
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
Ping...
Richard, could you shed some lights on this?
Thanks,
Dehao
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes the source location for automatically generated calls
to
the name it replaces, even if the replacement
is NULL.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
I will commit it with two revisions separating the changes to allow
easier bisection (the copy_ssa_name is a complete no-op).
Richard.
2012-08-07 Richard Guenther rguent
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
ChangeLog:
* target.def (vector_alignment): New target hook.
* doc/tm.texi.in
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Parang Saraf parang.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am facing some weird issues with the optimization flags. I tried
posting this in the gcc-help but got no response. Here is my query:
I can see the flags enabled for each optimization level using gcc -Q
-On
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:11:04 +0300 (EEST)
Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
I got no replies, so I guess there is no will to move GCC to -O3 by
default, so I shouldn't bother submitting a patch?
As a reminder, cc1
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Richard,
the code in emit_case_bit_tests currently introduces a MINUS_EXPR in signed
type
(without checking if signed types wrap or not), which could mean introduction
of
undefined overflow.
This patch fixes this
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
do you have an opinion on this patch (available here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01352.html
) ?
I like it. Thus, the referenced patch is ok for trunk.
Thanks,
Richard.
Or should we go back
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In PR54146, ifcvt spends a lot of time just clearing memory. This
patch changes the value maps to pointer-maps to fix this issue.
Bootstrappedtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK?
Ok!
Thanks,
Richard.
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
I don't think it's any good or clearer to understand.
Hi Richi, I had forgotten I prepared this for PR #19832, maybe you want to
take a look. FWIW, with my patch applied there is a difference
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:25 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nick,
You checked a huge change into 4,7 branch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-08/msg00149.html
Is this an accident?
I hope so. Please revert.
Thanks,
Richard.
--
H.J.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:26 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
H.J. Lu wrote:
I saw massive FORTRAN failures on trunk with both SPEC CPU 2006
and GCC FORTRAN testsuite. Is this a known problem? Should I open a bug
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
We are about ready to have the cxx-conversion branch merged back into trunk.
This merge will change the following:
1- The compiler can only be built with a C++ compiler.
2- The tree macros can be called from gdb (when
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
here is a patch handling multiplication of wrapping integer types in VRP. It
passed bootstrap+testsuite limited to c,c++ and without the testcase, so
I'll retest it better during the night. For some reason the
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
We can implement atomic_fetch_sub with atomic_fetch_add and inverted
operand 2. However, we have to prevent overflows with negation, so
only const_int
-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-08-03 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-vect-loop-manip.c (vect_can_advance_ivs_p): Query
is_gimple_reg on the SSA name, not its variable.
(vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer): Likewise.
* tree-ssa-copyrename.c
from before and after the patch (well, once that
bootstraps ;)).
Thanks,
Richard.
TODO:
* Add SSA_NAME_FOR_RESULT_DECL (), SSA_NAME_FOR_PARM_DECL () macros,
hiding the fact that SSA_NAME_VAR may be NULL.
* Likewise add a SSA_NAME_ARTIFICIAL () macro
2012-08-03 Richard Guenther rguent
This adds a bunch of new SSA name predicates to remove explicit uses
of SSA_NAME_VAR.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
I'm leaving this for comments. This mainly removes this cases from
explicit covering in further patches.
Richard.
2012-08-03 Richard Guenther rguent
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
as Steven noted in the bug report one reason of the slowness are the
myriads of calls to bitmap_set_bit, resulting from the clique generation
at the start of basic blocks. Can be sped up by using bitmap_ior. He
set_ssa_default_def (struct function *, tree, tree);
! extern tree ssa_default_def (struct function *, tree);
! extern tree get_or_create_ssa_default_def (struct function *, tree);
Queued for bootstrap and regtest on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-08-02 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
It's now a wrapper around create_tmp_reg.
Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-08-02 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-flow.h (make_rename_temp): Remove.
* tree-dfa.c (make_rename_temp): Likewise.
* cgraphunit.c
401 - 500 of 5652 matches
Mail list logo
