On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:48 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Seima Rao writes:
>> Has gcc become proprietory/commercial ?
>
> By definition: no, yes. It's been this way since the beginning, and
> hasn't changed in decades.
>
>> Or has it become
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 19 December 2016 at 10:17, Seima Rao wrote:
>> I was referring to one of three approaches:
>>
>> i) Write a Specification document and a matching testsuite
>>
>> ii) Document _all_ data and code toge
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:49 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 18/12/16 02:33, Seima Rao wrote:
>>> Precisely, stuffs like GENERIC, GIMPLE, RTL, gas(inline assembly),
>>> GCC extensions internals, ... and gnu&
sell less ?
Curious as an old gcc afficianado. :-|
p.s. Higher then GENERIC also sounds desirable.
Sincerely,
Seima Rao.
