On 04/04/2012 03:17 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Note there's nothing I'm planning to do, nor I should do, in this regard:
the two setups described above are both already supported by the current
automake implementation (but the last one
On 04/03/2012 10:39 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
Stefano == Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
Stefano On a second though, by double-checking the existing code, I
Stefano couldn't see how the 'cygnus' option could possibly influence
Stefano the location of the generated info
On 04/04/2012 01:53 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com writes:
OK, you've all made clear you have your sensible reasons to have the '.info'
...
it available only though the new, undocumented option named (literally)
hack!info-in-builddir. I hope this is acceptable to you.
de715b44d25ad523b558d7321ce87bcf8c0cdb09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: de715b44d25ad523b558d7321ce87bcf8c0cdb09.1333483415.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:02:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] texinfo: hack to allow '.info' files to be generated in the
builddir
On 04/03/2012 10:04 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OK, you've all made clear you have your sensible reasons to have the '.info'
files generated in the builddir in your use cases. Since the actual change
required by automake to allow this is very small and safe, I'm ready to do
it (see attached
On 04/03/2012 10:05 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 04/03/2012 10:04 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OK, you've all made clear you have your sensible reasons to have the '.info'
files generated in the builddir in your use cases. Since the actual change
required by automake to allow this is very
On 04/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
Stefano == Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
Stefano Note there's nothing I'm planning to do, nor I should do, in
Stefano this regard: the two setups described above are both already
Stefano supported by the current automake
On 04/02/2012 05:16 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
Stefano == Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
Stefano True, and that was even stated in the manual; the whole point
Stefano of ditching support for cygnus trees is that by now those two
Stefano big users are basically not making
On 04/02/2012 09:36 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
Stefano == Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
Stefano Sorry if I sound dense, but what exactly is the feature you are
Stefano talking about here?
I was under the impression that it would no longer be possible to build
info files
On 04/02/2012 10:19 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
Stefano == Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
Stefano It should still be possible, with the right hack (which is
Stefano tested in the testsuite, and required by other packages
Stefano anyway). The baseline is: if you don't want
Hi Ian, Joseph, and sorry for the delay.
On 03/29/2012 01:43 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
(I think avoiding info documentation being built in the source directory,
so that builds could use a non-writable source directory, may have been
Hi Alfred.
On 03/31/2012 11:08 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
- Have them distributed (automake's default). This means that
they will be build in the srcdir, not in the builddir: of
course, this only affects the maintainer, since for a user that
builds the package from
On 03/28/2012 02:19 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi Joseph, thanks for the feedback.
On 03/28/2012 01:24 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Is there better transition documentation somewhere?
Nope, but it would be a good idea to prepare it before starting to deprecate
the 'cygnus' option. Maybe
On 03/31/2012 01:38 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 03/28/2012 02:19 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi Joseph, thanks for the feedback.
On 03/28/2012 01:24 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Is there better transition documentation somewhere?
Nope, but it would be a good idea to prepare it before
Hello.
I see that binutils, GCC and GDB still use the Automake's 'cygnus' option
in some of their makefiles:
$ grep_cygnus() {
grep -r 'cygnus' . \
| perl -ne '/(^|[^@])cygnus($|(:!\.com\b))/ and print' \
| grep -v '^[^:]*/Makefile\.in:'; \
}
$ (cd ~/src/binutils
Hi Joseph, thanks for the feedback.
On 03/28/2012 01:24 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
But this option is going to be deprecated in Automake 1.12.1 and removed in
Automake 1.13:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11034
That page
On 03/28/2012 02:29 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
- texinfo.tex is not required if a Texinfo source file is specified. The
assumption is that the file will be supplied, but in a place that
Automake cannot find. This assumption
17 matches
Mail list logo
