On 01. 08. 20 13:02, Jojo R wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * genemit.c (main): Print 'split line'.
> * Makefile.in (insn-emit.c): Define split count and file
>
> ---
> gcc/Makefile.in | 11 +++
> gcc/genemit.c | 87 -
> 2 files
On 16.11.2015 03:00, David Edelsohn wrote:
>[..]
> Ten days and still waiting for a response on libtool-patches.
>
> - David
>
Drop a hint to libt...@gnu.org?
--
VH
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:24:00 -0400, Joern Rennecke wrote:
Quoting Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com:
Reviewers are frequently busy. I bet not a lot of reviewers apply
patches and play with it.
So it would be nice that people who submits such patches report changes
in compile
On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:28:37 +0800, Amker.Cheng wrote:
Hi all,
I compared assembly files of a function compiled by GCC4.3.4 and
GCC3.4.4.
The function focuses on array computation and has no branch, or any
loop structure,
The command line is like -march=mips32r2 -O3, and here is the
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
[...]
openSUSE 10.2 now comes with flex 2.5.33, but FreeBSD, for example, still
is at flex 2.5.4. Just some additional data pointes...
FreeBSD has version 2.5.33 as textproc/flex port.
--
Vaclav Haisman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
what is that status of this [1] extension being accepted into GCC? There
was some discussion but it died out without a conclusion.
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00666.html
--
Vaclav Haisman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Earl Chew wrote:
Is there a recent (3.4.2 or later) patch for the following problem?
Consider the short program fragment below. There are two failures, and
one success under gcc.
The entire fragment compiles ok with the latest Microsoft Visual Studio
and even one version before that.
The best way to get noticed and the problem fixed is to open a PR in GCC
Bugzilla: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
VH
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
