Re: Seeking patch for ambiguous conversion

Earl Chew wrote: > Is there a recent (3.4.2 or later) patch for the following problem? > > Consider the short program fragment below. There are two failures, and > one success under gcc. > > The entire fragment compiles ok with the latest Microsoft Visual Studio > and even one version before th

Nested namespaces extension

Hi, what is that status of this [1] extension being accepted into GCC? There was some discussion but it died out without a conclusion. [1] -- Vaclav Haisman signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: raising minimum version of Flex

Gerald Pfeifer wrote: [...] > openSUSE 10.2 now comes with flex 2.5.33, but FreeBSD, for example, still > is at flex 2.5.4. Just some additional data pointes... FreeBSD has version 2.5.33 as textproc/flex port. -- Vaclav Haisman signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: GCC4.3.4 downside against GCC3.4.4 on mips?

On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:28:37 +0800, "Amker.Cheng" wrote: > Hi all, > I compared assembly files of a function compiled by GCC4.3.4 and > GCC3.4.4. > The function focuses on array computation and has no branch, or any > loop structure, > The command line is like "-march=mips32r2 -O3", and here i

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:24:00 -0400, Joern Rennecke wrote: > Quoting Vladimir Makarov : >> Reviewers are frequently busy. I bet not a lot of reviewers apply >> patches and play with it. >> >> So it would be nice that people who submits such patches report changes >> in compile time/footprint/build

Re: gcc generates incorrect code with -Os

The best way to get noticed and the problem fixed is to open a PR in GCC Bugzilla: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ VH signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature