++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45329
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45330
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45331
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45332
org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45333
--- Comment #10 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-02 19:13 ---
There were problems with my original patch (Sadly, I don't recall the
details.). I haven't looked at this in a while and am unlikely to do so soon.
If someone else wants to look at this, please feel free to do so
--- Comment #8 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-01 08:57 ---
Subject: Bug 8171
Author: aaw
Date: Sat Dec 1 08:56:55 2007
New Revision: 130554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130554
Log:
PR c++/8171
gcc/cp/
* typeck.c
--- Comment #9 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-01 09:08 ---
Fixed by revision 130554.
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 10:43 ---
Should this bug be marked as resolved, then?
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 06:26 ---
Fixed by change 127600.
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 21:42 ---
Subject: Bug 31749
Author: aaw
Date: Fri Aug 17 21:42:38 2007
New Revision: 127600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127600
Log:
PR c++/31749
gcc/cp/
* name-lookup.c
--- Comment #5 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 21:24 ---
No segfault, but it does give an is already declared in this scope error.
Contrary to the claim in the initial bug submission, this is valid code.
From paragraph 10, section 7.3.3 of the C++ standard:
Since a using
--- Comment #6 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 23:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=14030)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14030action=view)
Fix for PR 31749.
This patches fixes this PR and includes some ambiguous decl cleanup as well.
Submission pending
--- Comment #6 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-14 22:32 ---
I've just run into this problem trying to test an unrelated change.
Here's a puzzler, though. If I run the g++.dg/rtti/repo1.C test, it compiles
successfully. If I copy the command line for the compilation but modify
--- Comment #4 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-31 21:18 ---
I've got a fix to this as part of my using directive / using declaration
cleanup. I'll disentangle this from the rest of my changes and submit a patch
soonish.
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #3 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 22:41 ---
Assigning to myself since I now have write access to Bugzilla.
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 01:16 ---
Resolved by r124960 (cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg01182.html).
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 01:19 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30734 ***
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 01:19 ---
*** Bug 2708 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
19 matches
Mail list logo
