http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm on Easter vacation this week, will take a look after that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5)
The PR is fixed by the patch in comment 2 without regression, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-02/msg01688.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Feb 25 06:35:09 2014
New Revision: 208109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208109root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/60292
* sel-sched.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60268
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Feb 24 05:57:02 2014
New Revision: 208066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208066root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
2014-02-24 Andrey Belevantsev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60268
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here the assert added while fixing PR 57422 means that we should always be able
to schedule the current fence instruction. The PR 57422 analysis was good but
for the added assert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60268
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
I forgot the single block regions case, so the nr_regions_initial init should
be moved to the bottom of sched_rgn_init.
The check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60268
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Feb 18 05:41:29 2014
New Revision: 207832
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207832root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/58960
* haifa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60086
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
...
doesn't reorder those is that RA allocates the same register. With -O3
-mavx -fselective-scheduling2 the stores are also changed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60086
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Forgot to mention that we end up scheduling this block in 21 cycles while the
regular scheduling needs 24. Not that it's so important though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to fabien from comment #10)
The testcase is not valid, as a using declaration shall refer to a direct
base class, which is not the case in 'using ns::Base::i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
Hmm, oops. The testcase has a true dependence ... ;) Still, isn't the
code in sched_analyze_2 wrong? Or are pending_mems all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
I'd say if (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI ...) (const_int ...)) not surrounded by
(const:SI ) is considered invalid IL, then trying
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Feb 3 12:00:23 2014
New Revision: 207421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207421root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/57662
* sel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And indeed, if we change the test case to
int foo (long long *a, short *b, int n)
{
int k = *b + 1000;
*a = (long long) (n * 100);
return k;
}
then we get the desired anti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #7)
Testresults: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-01/msg01781.html
No regressions, and g++.dg/opt/pr48272.C now passes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jan 21 10:22:07 2014
New Revision: 206876
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206876root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-12-23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jan 21 12:31:35 2014
New Revision: 206880
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206880root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Dec 23 06:41:22 2013
New Revision: 206173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206173root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57422
* sel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Dec 23 06:43:49 2013
New Revision: 206174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206174root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57422
* sel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
Fixed according to
2013-08-14 Andrey Belevantsev a...@ispras.ru
PR rtl-optimization/57662
* sel-sched.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30650
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30650action=edit
proposed patch
When moving up an instruction, we can make empty basic blocks or create
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #6)
Fixed for 4.9.0.
Do you plan to backport this to 4.7 and 4.8?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #4)
I created a test case for all type conversion operators:
Paolo has already submitted a patch with the expanded test case at
http
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: abel at gcc dot gnu.org
The following code is accepted by g++ (versions 3.3, 4.6, 4.7 at least, I
didn't check trunk) but seems to be invalid c++ and is rejected by clang 3.2,
icc 13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|g++ accepts invalid |g++ accepts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57105
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57105
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-29
09:18:26 UTC ---
Does the patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957#c9 fixes
your issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57105
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-29
09:40:11 UTC ---
Fine, I've tested it on ia64 and got an offline approval from Alexander, I'd
need to test on x86-64 and commit then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29886|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-22
09:48:37 UTC ---
I see some more ICEs of the same type while testing on ia64, so the patch might
not be enough in general, though it fixes the original test. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
09:18:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 29886 [details]
proposed patch
You should probably make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-17
05:14:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Breakpoint 5, sel_remove_insn (insn=0x3fffb5da4e78, only_disconnect=false,
full_tidying=false) at ../../trunk/gcc/sel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11
06:17:41 UTC ---
The patch adds more pending list flushes and thus more dependencies. So by
itself it is conservative and should not result in correctness issues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56912
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #29 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-03
05:59:53 UTC ---
Ported to 4.7 and 4.6, though no bugzilla commit made. Do I close the bug or
do we want to fix the front-end to produce the proper volatile bits?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-03
15:51:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
So are we going to backport this one?
Sorry, I've missed this one when backporting other stuff. I can do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #27 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-27
08:56:15 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Feb 27 08:56:08 2013
New Revision: 196308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196308
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #26 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-26
09:21:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 29539
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29539
scheduler patch
I'm testing the attached patch to fix the ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-25
08:48:48 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Feb 25 08:48:42 2013
New Revision: 196252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196252
Log:
2013-02-25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #32 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-19
13:50:59 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Feb 19 13:50:50 2013
New Revision: 196137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196137
Log:
2012-02-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18
11:08:10 UTC ---
I will test the patch removing the JUMP_P part of the conditional on x86-64 and
ia64, but for 4.8 I'd suggest trying some more platforms, like ppc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29146|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #28 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
06:11:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
(In reply to comment #26)
You are right, your suggestions is what I sketched in comment #21 as
choices 1
or 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56200
Bug #: 56200
Summary: queens benchmark is faster with -O0 than with any
other optimization level
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #26 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-01
12:22:05 UTC ---
You are right, your suggestions is what I sketched in comment #21 as choices 1
or 2. Sorry for my unclear expalanation of what was actually
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #23 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-24
13:37:05 UTC ---
You are right from the target maintainer point of view, as you understand what
really happens in the code. But this is not what the compiler sees
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
10:15:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Neither insn 24/145 nor insn 28 move through insn 17. The two UNSPEC 44 insn
(LC..2,, LCM..2) are inputs to insn 17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #13 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
13:23:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
I've tried to reproduce this with a cross compiler (without cross binutils) on
x86_64-linux host, but it ICEs elsewhere
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
17:31:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Indeed, with #c18 patch I can reproduce the ICE. Andrey, can you try that
too?
Sure, will do, I'll be out of office
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18
11:09:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 29202
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29202
more debug printing patch
From the log, the problem looks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09
14:26:22 UTC ---
I've just got back from the holidays, I will take a look probably on Friday.
David's analysis hints that the scheduler should treat the insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09
12:28:30 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Nov 9 12:28:21 2012
New Revision: 193358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193358
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09
12:33:33 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, backports to 4.7/4.6 are needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-30
08:25:24 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 30 08:25:16 2012
New Revision: 192979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192979
Log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #21 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28
18:17:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
This issue still exists in mainline, there seems to be no objection to
Andrey's
suggested fix, could someone please
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-26
14:04:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Have you managed to check the patch?
The patch does the right thing for sets and clobbers, but the uses case should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-22
19:34:41 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Oct 22 19:34:35 2012
New Revision: 192693
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192693
Log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
13:20:37 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:20:30 2012
New Revision: 192497
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192497
Log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
13:22:26 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:22:22 2012
New Revision: 192498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192498
Log:
2012-10-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
17:47:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
For some reason, -fselective-scheduling is moving
(insn 19 16 22 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 ax)) testcase.c:6 -1
(nil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-03
08:21:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Created attachment 28121 [details]
gcc48-pr54455.patch
Patch for 2). asm goto with fallthru labels is pretty hard case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09
14:08:38 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Aug 9 14:08:31 2012
New Revision: 190253
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190253
Log:
PR rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
11:26:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 27959
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27959
proposed patch
The problem is that when checking expressions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31
10:56:59 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jul 31 10:56:52 2012
New Revision: 190005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190005
Log:
PR target/53975
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #19 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31
11:11:22 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk. Judging by the time the original wrong patch went in, this
should be a regression and thus I'll commit this to 4.7 too after a week or so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #14 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-24
09:22:14 UTC ---
The problem is that we don't handle this type of speculation well in sel-sched.
While moving an insn through speculation check, it is hard to decide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #13 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-20
08:49:54 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Jul 20 08:49:52 2012
New Revision: 189705
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189705
Log:
Backport from
101 - 200 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
