[Bug fortran/53718] New: gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53718 Bug #: 53718 Summary: gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/53718] [4.7/4.8 regression] [OOP] gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53718 --- Comment #2 from Adrian Prantl adrian at llnl dot gov 2012-06-18 18:55:11 UTC --- just as a side note: most of my bugreports come from compiling babel's regression test suite. Babel is a language interoperability tool that (also) generates

[Bug c++/52759] New: ICE in 4.7.0, C++ in cp/mangle.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52759 Bug #: 52759 Summary: ICE in 4.7.0, C++ in cp/mangle.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug c++/52759] ICE in 4.7.0, C++ in cp/mangle.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52759 --- Comment #1 from Adrian Prantl adrian at llnl dot gov 2012-03-28 21:42:11 UTC --- Created attachment 27024 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27024 delta-reduced example

[Bug fortran/52679] New: ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52679 Bug #: 52679 Summary: ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/52622] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 --- Comment #2 from Adrian Prantl adrian at llnl dot gov 2012-03-20 15:33:40 UTC --- I'm getting the error with both gcc 4.6.2 and 4.6.3 Below is the stack trace. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. resolve_symbol (sym=0x14091b0

[Bug fortran/52622] New: ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 Bug #: 52622 Summary: ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/51520] New: ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520 Bug #: 51520 Summary: ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/51522] New: ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51522 Bug #: 51522 Summary: ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/48291] New: internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 Summary: internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/48279] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 --- Comment #4 from Adrian Prantl adrian at llnl dot gov 2011-03-25 18:59:48 UTC --- It is actually possible to combine the test into a single file: minimal.F03 module sidl_string_array type sidl_string_1d end type sidl_string_1d

[Bug fortran/48291] internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 Adrian Prantl adrian at llnl dot gov changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.6.0 |4.3.0 --- Comment

[Bug fortran/48291] internal compiler error, new_symbol(): Symbol name too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291 --- Comment #3 from Adrian Prantl adrian at llnl dot gov 2011-03-25 22:04:52 UTC --- Thus the inelegant solution would be to define GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN to (63*2)+1+strlen(_def_init).

[Bug fortran/48279] New: segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Summary: segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/48279] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Adrian Prantl adrian at llnl dot gov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adrian at llnl dot

[Bug fortran/48279] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Adrian Prantl adrian at llnl dot gov changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker