[Bug libstdc++/51785] gets not anymore declared

2016-12-06 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785 andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andyg1001 at hotmail dot

[Bug target/31798] lib1funcs.asm:1000: undefined reference to `raise'

2016-12-05 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31798 andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andyg1001 at hotmail dot

[Bug c++/52282] [C++0x] ICE / confused by earlier errors with decltype/constexpr

2012-05-04 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282 --- Comment #3 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-05-04 16:22:21 UTC --- This ICE still occurs in the release version of gcc 4.7.0. Here is the output from compiling the attached test-case as is: $ g++-4.7 -std=c++11 ice.cpp ice.cpp

[Bug c++/53166] New: static_assert produces bogus warning

2012-04-30 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53166 Bug #: 53166 Summary: static_assert produces bogus warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug c++/52282] [C++0x] ICE / confused by earlier errors with decltype/constexpr

2012-02-24 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282 --- Comment #2 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-02-24 17:42:59 UTC --- Created attachment 26743 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26743 test-case for decltype ICE / incorrect evaluation of constexpr The attached test-case

[Bug c++/52282] New: [C++0x] ICE / confused by earlier errors with decltype/constexpr

2012-02-16 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282 Bug #: 52282 Summary: [C++0x] ICE / confused by earlier errors with decltype/constexpr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51723] [C++0x] delegating constructor ICE

2012-01-01 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723 --- Comment #2 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-01-01 13:05:50 UTC --- I have double-checked and, yes, it does work in the latest revision from trunk - sorry, I ought to have checked that first.

[Bug c++/51723] [C++0x] delegating constructor ICE

2012-01-01 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723 --- Comment #6 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-01-01 15:25:50 UTC --- As a suggestion, the test case added in commit http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=182768 should have the additional two lines: constexpr B b1 = A10, 20

[Bug c++/51723] New: [C++0x] delegating constructor ICE

2011-12-31 Thread andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723 Bug #: 51723 Summary: [C++0x] delegating constructor ICE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3