[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16

2024-06-20 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #13 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- oh i see, i didn't realise that thumb was pure 16 bit. my apologies. so i guess i meant thumb2, which would have the same effect of the mips16/minterlink-mips16 flags that i use to "collapse" 32

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16

2024-06-20 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #11 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- dear lad(ettes), i just want to take this opportunity to contrast this scenario, had the equivalent occurred on the inferior, unjustifiably hyped, ARM architecture's "thumb" mode, which is arguably

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16

2024-06-17 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #10 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- Created attachment 58456 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58456=edit findutils 4.10 failure

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16

2024-06-17 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #9 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- Created attachment 58452 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58452=edit curl failure this is not gd guysss :

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16

2024-06-16 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #8 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- how did you respond so fast? i don't see you on the CC list. that's kind of cool but eerie. that's usually MY modus operandi, lol

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16

2024-06-16 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 gagan sidhu (broly) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|regression between gcc |regression between gcc

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16 with openssl

2024-06-16 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #5 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- hi andrew, i tried compiling another program that wasn't openssl and a similar issue arose. something is seriously wrong in 14.1.0 in terms of -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16 mode this is kinda

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16 with openssl

2024-06-09 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #4 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- well, i can give the final pass since it's a bit generic: AR=ar LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,/cross/lib" \ ../gcc-14.1.0/configure --prefix=/cross \ --target=mips64el-none-linux-gnu

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16 with openssl

2024-06-09 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #3 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- that's my secret sauce, dogg. i can email it to you but don't give it out.

[Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16 with openssl

2024-06-09 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 --- Comment #1 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- Created attachment 58395 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58395=edit mips64el-none-linux-gnu, openssl 1.1.1v, mabi=32, glibc 2.38

[Bug target/115408] New: regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16 with openssl

2024-06-09 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115408 Bug ID: 115408 Summary: regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16 with openssl Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

2023-07-05 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 --- Comment #22 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- yes it’s fixed sorry. i foolishly forgot to set the architecture when installing the headers, which caused the alleged problems. after i did that, it was completely fixed. hat tip to the serb on

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

2023-05-03 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 --- Comment #20 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- my apologies, i should open a new ticket if this is indeed an error. but it may be my fault for not specifying the ARCH parameter when installing the linux headers prior to starting the toolchain.

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

2023-05-03 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 --- Comment #19 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- seems that 13.1.0 still needs some modification, because i was building the toolchain and now get a static assertion error: > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile >

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

2022-11-20 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 --- Comment #18 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- hi, i wanted to correct an inaccuracy in my previous comment, as i needed to build a MIPS64 multilib toolchain today and ran into the same problem. the solution is, as my friend of chinese origin

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

2022-08-30 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 --- Comment #17 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #16) > (In reply to gagan sidhu (broly) from comment #15) > > > and also: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=9f943b2446f2d0 > > Please don't use

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

2022-08-30 Thread broly at mac dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 gagan sidhu (broly) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||broly at mac dot com --- Comment