https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88288
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Why not update goacc_parallel_keyed to use gomp_map_val instead computing
devaddrs manually? That would help reduce the number of duplicate mystery
formulas in libgomp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77765
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72715
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is still broken in trunk. Mentor probably has a fix for it in og8, but
Thomas or someone else in their OpenACC team will need to port it over to
trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70828
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I see that fix has been submitted to gomp-4_0-branch. Thomas, does Mentor have
any pending patches to resolve this in trunk, if it is still relevant?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The goacc_parlevel patches have been backported to openacc-gcc-8-branch in git
revision 6781e2dd99. For the most part, the patches applied cleanly, however, I
had to xfail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660
--- Comment #9 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8)
> Hmm, for me that minimizes to:
> ...
> extern "C" void abort ();
>
> #pragma omp declare target
> int results[2000];
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 44431
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44431=edit
LTO graceful abort patch
With the LTO graceful abort patch, I now see this error:
lto1: error: Miss
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following ICE with libgomp.c++/for-15.C with nvptx-offloading:
lto1: internal compiler error: in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:1393
0xc1d8d5 input_varpool_node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86263
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
--- Comment #6 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jun 15 14:03:00 2018
New Revision: 261631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261631=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85703
Backport from mainline
2018-06-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85702
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jun 15 14:01:00 2018
New Revision: 261630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261630=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85702
Backport from mainline
2018-06-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85701
--- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jun 15 13:59:14 2018
New Revision: 261629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261629=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85701
Backport from mainline
2018-06-05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85702
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Jun 13 14:31:17 2018
New Revision: 261551
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261551=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85703
gcc/fortran/
* parse.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85702
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Jun 13 14:29:04 2018
New Revision: 261550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261550=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85702
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85701
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85701
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Tue Jun 5 13:58:50 2018
New Revision: 261202
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261202=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85701
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85879
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu May 31 14:10:10 2018
New Revision: 261025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261025=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix PR middle-end/85879
gcc/
* gimplify.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85879
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85782
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri May 18 15:46:56 2018
New Revision: 260370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260370=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85782
Backport from mainline
2018-05-18 Cesar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85782
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri May 18 15:43:09 2018
New Revision: 260369
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260369=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85782
gcc/cp/
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44130
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44130=edit
test.cpp
G++ ICEs when it encounters OpenACC loops that contains continue stateme
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44113
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44113=edit
sizeof test
As of trunk revision 257065, the sizeof function is return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85381
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955
--- Comment #6 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I reverted that patch from trunk, and will revisit this issue during stage1.
It should be noted that GCC also chokes with any empty OpenACC loop in general.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85383
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I ended up reverting the patch in r259351. It should be working now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85383
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm building a power8 toolchain right now. If the fix isn't immediately
obvious, I'll revert that patch for pr84955. After all, empty loops are
uninteresting in OpenACC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955
--- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Apr 12 13:15:45 2018
New Revision: 259346
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259346=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/84955
gcc/
* lto-streamer-out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
--- Comment #6 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Tue Apr 3 14:04:22 2018
New Revision: 259032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259032=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85056
Backport from mainline
2018-03-27 Cesar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
--- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Mar 30 15:47:23 2018
New Revision: 258978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258978=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85056
Backport from mainline
2018-03-27 Cesar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Tue Mar 27 13:54:03 2018
New Revision: 258885
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258885=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85056
gcc/
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It fails in C with this:
#pragma acc parallel loop tile(2,3)
for (i = 1; i < 10; i++)
for (j = 1; j < 10; j++)
for (;;)
;
It must be that empty loop that tripping up th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 43744
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43744=edit
WIP patch
It looks like nvptx_assmeble_decl_begin ignores the array type information.
This patch reco
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 43743
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43743=edit
test case
The attached test case consists of two files, one containing a definit
: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Both libgomp.fortran/examples-4/declare_target-1.f90 and
libgomp.fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84571
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84570
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80547
--- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I wasn't able to reproduce the nvptx ICE in og7. However, the host fallback
does segfault at runtime in og7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83790
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jan 19 14:21:08 2018
New Revision: 256891
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256891=gcc=rev
Log:
[nvptx] Add support for CUDA 9
PR target/83790
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920
--- Comment #10 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And here is the working code in -O2:
{
.reg.u32%x;
mov.u32 %x, %tid.x;
setp.ne.u32 %r71, %x, 0;
}
@%r71 bra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920
--- Comment #9 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I figured out why my patch does work. Here's the assembly code for your C test
case at -O0:
{
.reg.u32%x;
mov.u32 %x, %tid.x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920
--- Comment #8 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tweaked your proposed fix as follows:
diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
index 55c7e3cbf90..24625cd303f 100644
--- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
+++ b/gcc/config/nvptx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 43165
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43165=edit
assembly code
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 43164
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43164=edit
gemm test case
Here <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00516.html> Tom poste
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78266
--- Comment #8 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Because num_gangs exceeds largest unsigned value that can be represented by the
induction variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78266
--- Comment #6 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm not sure that solution is correct. A better solution would be to report an
error/warning stating that num_workers exceeds the size of the induction
variable. Also, in the case that user
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81442
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77765
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Jun 29 19:07:10 2017
New Revision: 249810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249810=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR fortran/77765
gcc/fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77765
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Jun 29 19:03:43 2017
New Revision: 249809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249809=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/77765
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80029
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80029
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Mar 22 13:52:10 2017
New Revision: 246381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246381=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/80029
gcc/
* gimplify.c (is_oacc_declared
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80029
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> That doesn't work, it is too early.
> With:
> --- gimplify.c.jj 2017-03-08 18:19:24.0 +0100
> +++ gimplify.c2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78027
--- Comment #7 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Last I heard in <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01050.html>
Jakub was going to look for a better solution. My patch is still in trunk, but
if necessary I could always revert it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78027
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Dec 9 14:45:54 2016
New Revision: 243488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243488=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ipa/78027
gcc/
* ipa-icf.c (sem_function
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu, nvptx-none
Created attachment 3
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72715
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Mon Aug 29 21:16:04 2016
New Revision: 239845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239845=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/72715
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74755
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The target is nvptx-none, specifically when it is built as an offloaded target
for OpenACC. Thomas thinks the problem is in newlib rather than gcc though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70828
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Aug 18 01:12:15 2016
New Revision: 239554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239554=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70828
gcc/
* gimplify.c (struct
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu, nvptx-none
Created attachment 39268
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #6 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #5)
> (In reply to cesar from comment #4)
> Are you saying that's not how the Fortran front end operates, and the
> "SUBROUTINE r_w&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I could be mistaken, but I don't think there's anything we can do about that
test case because fortran doesn't have file scope. Specifically, in your
example,
SUBROUTINE r_w
IMPLICIT NONE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jul 29 04:20:00 2016
New Revision: 238847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238847=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/72741
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Jun 1 20:40:10 2016
New Revision: 237012
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237012=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/70688
* pr70688.c: New file.
Added:
branches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Jun 1 20:37:44 2016
New Revision: 237011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237011=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/70688
* pr70688.c: New file.
Added:
trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38621
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38621=edit
new test case
This issue has been resolved in trunk r236678. I forgot to include a PR tag in
the Change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626
--- Comment #6 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Mon May 9 20:42:47 2016
New Revision: 236049
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236049=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport trunk r235651:
2016-04-29 Cesar Philippidis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69363
--- Comment #8 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Mon May 9 20:23:31 2016
New Revision: 236047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236047=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport trunk r235290:
2016-04-20 Ilya Verbin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #3)
> (In reply to cesar from comment #2)
> > Consequently, you need to
> > explicitly use num_gangs, num_workers and vector_leng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thomas is correct. Note that when gcc-6.2 is released you should be able to
replace
!$acc parallel vector_length(vl)
!$acc loop reduction(+:pi) private(t)
with
!$acc parallel loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 29 17:42:04 2016
New Revision: 235651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235651=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/c-family/
PR middle-end/70626
* c-common.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 29 17:37:55 2016
New Revision: 235650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235650=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/c-family/
PR middle-end/70626
* c-common.h
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38351
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38351=e
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38285
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38285=edit
test c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70643
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70643
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Apr 14 13:44:17 2016
New Revision: 234973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234973=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70643
gcc/
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68242
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68242
--- Comment #7 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:54:41 2016
New Revision: 234957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234957=gcc=rev
Log:
libgomp/
PR testsuite/68242
* testsuite
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38248
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38248=edit
bro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70357
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70357
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Mon Apr 11 23:21:28 2016
New Revision: 234889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234889=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/70357
* gimplify.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38238
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38238=edit
counter example
I looked at the standard again, and it says that the reduction clause should be
associa
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38233
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38233=edit
test c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70533
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70373
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70535
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70535
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
PR tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289
--- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
PR tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
--- Comment #10 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
PR tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
PR tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70533
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
PR tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70373
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
PR tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
--- Comment #9 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch I posted for PR70289 a couple of days ago also resolves this issue:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00202.html
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
