[Bug c++/17000] parse error calling member template function of non-lvalue from within template class member

2007-04-20 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from ddneilson at gmail dot com 2007-04-20 18:51 --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) The work around is doing: get_a().template func2 int(); Which tells the compiler for sure func2 is a template. Thanks, yeh I figured that out

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-21 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-21 20:28 --- One of the really odd things, that makes me still think this is a bug in some way is that the definition of mysignbit() that I gave in signbit.cpp is identical to the definition of __signbitf(x) as given

[Bug other/23469] New: Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ddneilson at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-18 20:43 --- Created an attachment (id=9535) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9535action=view) Source file of example -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23469

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-18 20:44 --- Created an attachment (id=9536) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9536action=view) .ii file generated by compiling with: g++ -Wall -v -save-temps signbit.cpp -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-18 20:45 --- Created an attachment (id=9537) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9537action=view) Ouput from compile with: g++ -Wall -v -save-temps signbit.cpp -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-18 20:46 --- Created an attachment (id=9538) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9538action=view) .ii file generated by compiling with: g++ -Wall -v -O1 -save-temps signbit.cpp -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-18 20:47 --- Created an attachment (id=9539) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9539action=view) Output from compile with: g++ -Wall -v -O1 -save-temps signbit.cpp -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #9537|Ouput from compile with: g++|Output from compile with: description|-Wall -v -save-temps|g++ -Wall -v -save-temps

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-18 20:49 --- Created an attachment (id=9540) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9540action=view) Output from running the program without optimizations -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug other/23469] Behaviour of built-in __signbitf(x) differs with optimization

2005-08-18 Thread ddneilson at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-18 20:49 --- Created an attachment (id=9541) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9541action=view) Output from running the program with -O1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23469