https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88876
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
$ /usr/local/gcc_current/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/gcc_current/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/lto-wrapper
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r261210 PASS
r261341 FAIL
r267961 FAIL
$ cat a.i
extern int c();
int a;
int b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #6)
> r267445 PASS
sorry for noise
1. testcase from PR FAIL for me with r267445
2. real-world-code-compilation not FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r267445 PASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r266001 PASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r265259 FAIL
/home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --disable-multilib
--with-isl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r265184 PASS
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r265032 PASS
r265255 FAIL
Fedora 28, x86_64
configured as
/home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
gcc invocation can be simplified : -fno-semantic-interposition can be removed.
(was needed while creducing original testcase)
So,
$ g++ -fpreprocessed -O2 -flto -fPIC -DPIC -c -o a.o a.ii
$ g++
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r263651 PASS
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r262850 works for me.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86523
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r262559 PASS
r262747 FAIL
$ cat x.ii
class a {
int b;
};
int const c = 0, d = 1, f = 2, g = 3;
struct B {
typedef a h;
h i;
};
template B j();
template struct k { static B const e; };
template
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r255090 FAIL
r262747 FAIL
$ cat x.ii
class a b;
c() {
switch ()
case b
$ /usr/local/gcc_current/bin/g++ -fpreprocessed -std=c++98 x.ii
x.ii:1:9: error: aggregate ‘a b’ has
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dimhen at gmail dot com, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
CC: dimhen at gmail dot com
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
duplicate PR84670?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #23 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
...
> Isn't that
> an old data file you forgot to remove?
After rebuild all and re-run myproject' tests I can confirm
1) r257859 FAIL
2) r257859 + patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #22 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
...
> Isn't that
> an old data file you forgot to remove?
I'll rebuild all and 'll report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #19 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> (In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #17)
> > No ICE!
> > Thank Martin!
>
> Good. Can you please attach gcov file for the problematic invocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #17 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
No ICE!
Thank Martin!
And once more strangeness
I have (at least) 2 messages 'YYY.gcda:stamp mismatch with notes file'
from 3K gcno-files in full project.
$ ~/build/gcc_current/prev-gcc/gcov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #16 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14)
> Created attachment 43508 [details]
> Patch candidate
...
> Which is correct in my opinion. Can you please Dmitry test the patch?
Thank you Martin!
I'll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #13 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Created attachment 43507
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43507=edit
gcno+gcda: rebuild
2 functions at 18:5:18
and 4 at 20:5:20
Its issue b) -- I am understand correctly?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> Thank you very much for help. So I see 2 problems:
...
> Is the project you are building public so I can build it locally and debug
> case b) ?
Alas, its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Created attachment 43505
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43505=edit
header
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/CSP/unittest/CpCapi20UnitTest -I../../..
-I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild -I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/CSP/src/include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #43502|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Created attachment 43502
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43502=edit
preproccessed src file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r257859 build w/o --enable-checking=extra FAIL too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28564
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> The request sound eligible for me.
> What others think about it?
Nice to have for me
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 43495
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43495=e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
I'm a bit confused:
-- warning about `static inline bar()' inlined into `foo()'
-- and no warning about `baz()'
What is the difference?
May be no warnings will be more consistent?
$ cat x.c
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83125
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
one more test w/o -fpic and with less aggressive inlining
$ /usr/local/gcc_current/bin/g++ -Wall -Wextra -O2 --param
early-inlining-insns=18 --param max-early-inliner-iterations=10 -c
-fpreprocessed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83125
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
in r255225 stack differ
during IPA pass: inline
x.ii:43:10: internal compiler error: in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:993
t::~t() {}
^
0x9c13cf edge_badness
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83125
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #0)
Stack for r255090
x.ii:43:10: internal compiler error: in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1025
t::~t() {}
^
0x9e81af edge_badness
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r254663 PASS
r254924 FAIL
r255090 FAIL
sound similar to PR83001 and PR83051
PASS if I lower
-O level
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r254985 PASS
r255052 FAIL
libtool: compile: /home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
--- Comment #16 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #15)
Thank you. Nice warnings!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
--- Comment #13 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Sounds like -Wno-stringop-overflow does not propagate into LTO build.
I'll try make a small testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
--- Comment #12 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
char *strncpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t n);
void foo(char* p)
{
strncpy(p, "1", 1);
p[1] = 0;
}
with gcc8/r254663 is this expected?
$ gcc -c -Wall x.c
x.c: In function ‘foo’:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81940
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r251306 PASS for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81940
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r251301 FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81940
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
$ cat x.ii
int a, b = a;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81940
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
$ g++ -fpreprocessed -Werror -Wall -Wextra -flto -O -std=c++98 x.ii -fpic -DPIC
-c -o x.o && g++ -shared x.o -g -flto -o x.so
during IPA pass: inline
/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/ipsec/esp/esp_init.cpp:
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r251205 PASS
r251258 FAIL
FAIL : g++ -O -flto x.ii -fpic -DPIC -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r249904 PASS
r249907 FAIL
r250073 FAIL
sounds like
r249907 | hubicka | 2017-07-03 15:42:07 +0300 (Mon, 03 Jul 2017) | 7 lines
Changed paths:
M /trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
M /trunk/gcc/profile-count.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
oh, sorry r299923 FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r299904 PASS
r299023 FAIL
~/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--enable-checking=yes --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
with r249967 and make -j5 and 4-core CPU
I receive
coretypes.h:367:10: fatal error: insn-modes-inline.h: No such file or directory
after
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r247015 FAIL
r249982 FAIL
$ cat x.c
int f1(int i)
{
if( i == 0 ||
i == 0 || /* PRESENT warning */
i == 1
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r249892 PASS
r249961 (?) FAIL / sadly, I rm this version from HDD & cant double-check
r249982 FAIL
$ cat x.i
__attribute__((__co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r249961 PASS for me
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r249632 PASS
r249892 FAIL
$ cat x.ii
extern "C" unsigned long strlen(const char *);
int a(char *b) {
b[strl
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77720
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77720
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc version 7.0.0 20160922 (experimental) [trunk revision 240342] (GCC)
no warns in foo() but warns in bar()
$ cat x.c
int snprintf (char*, __SIZE_TYPE__, const
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc version 7.0.0 20160922 (experimental) [trunk revision 240342] (GCC)
-O2 : warning for baz()
-O3 : warning for bar() and baz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r239190 FAIL
r239091 FAIL
r239090 PASS
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r239064 PASS
r239176 FAIL
Fedora24/x86_64
~/src/gcc_current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71159
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71159
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> Sorry, got it wrong way around.
> Index: lto-cgraph.c
> ===
> --- lto-cgraph.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71159
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r236299 FAIL
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r236277 FAIL
Error appears after fix ICE for inline_small_functions() : r236270 -- r236274
Sadly, error occurred while build big library. I'll try
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r236043 PASS
r236132 FAIL
/home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--enable-checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68166
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r229584 PASS
r229585 FAIL
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r229455 PASS
r229606 FAIL
Fedora 22/x64
~/src/gcc_current/configure
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r227942 FAIL
r227792 PASS
~/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67647
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Fedora 22 / x64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66449
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to amker from comment #3)
Author: amker
Date: Tue Jun 23 02:27:49 2015
New Revision: 224769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224769root=gccview=rev
Log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
Where does this obfuscated 'return *(e-pu)' come from?
If I remove aggregate then there are no warning.
i.e. this code produce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66452
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
r224136 PASS
r224161 FAIL (stage1 compiler due broken bootstrap)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66449
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
start FAIL for me : r224020
configure as
$ ~/src/gcc_r224020/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current --enable-static
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r223920 PASS
r224193 FAIL
gcc -fpreprocessed -Werror -Wall -O2 -c x.i PASS
gcc -fpreprocessed -Werror -Wall -O3 -c x.i FAIL
$ cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66354
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66354
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #0)
Sorry, I have no compact testcase.
Could you at least use -fno-sanitize
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Sorry, I have no compact testcase.
/usr/local/gcc_current/include/c++/6.0.0/bits/stl_algobase.h:708:7: runtime
error: null
: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r222758 PASS
r222759 FAIL
Alas, I had no compact testcase.
But 'argv[i] -- filename' change is not clear for me.
At least, its not mentioned in ChangeLog :)
$ svn diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66125
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
Testcase? The fix makes options from archive members visible to lto-wrapper,
so you likely have a mismatch between -fPIC / -fno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66125
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r222031 PASS
r222198 FAIL
$ cat x.ii
typedef int tf();
struct S {
tf m_fn1;
} a;
void fn1()
{
try {
__builtin_va_list c;
{
int *d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
r212420 PASS
r212492 FAIL
gcc version 4.10.0 20140710 (experimental) [trunk revision 212420] (GCC)
gcc version 4.10.0 20140713 (experimental) [trunk revision 212492] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
start FAIL r212452 (fix for PR middle-end/61473)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|incorrect warning |[4.9
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
gcc version 5.0.0 20150404 (experimental) [trunk revision 221866] (GCC)
$ cat x.i
typedef unsigned mytype; // 'int' fixes issue
struct S {
mytype *pu;
};
mytype f(struct S *e)
{
mytype x;
if(x != e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
--- Comment #15 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
So, can the reporter or anyone else still reproduce a problem in this area
or can it be considered fixed?
last FAIL for me
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
r216735 PASS
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r218766 PASS
r218767 FAIL
r220090 FAIL
Fedora 21 / x86_64
$ cat t.ii
typedef void tf(struct s);
struct s {
tf *pf;
};
void fn1(void *);
static void fn2(s);
main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64795
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
possible duplicate PR64374 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
start FAIL r218767
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r218764 PASS
r218817 FAIL, r218991 FAIL
Fedora 21 / x86_64
gcc -fpreprocessed -O3 -flto -c a.i -fPIC -DPIC -o a.o
g++ -fpreprocessed -O3 -flto -c b.ii -fPIC -DPIC -o b.o
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63805
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #2)
I have similar error in LTO/x86_64, but stack is slightly different.
Its different issue (now PR64374)
Sorry for noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
Looks like mixing of pic and non pic is causing the issue.
May be one more issue :
-- without '-O3' during compilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #0)
Oh, I edit files after copy/paste error message.
The correct one is the following:
e.ii: In function ‘main’:
e.ii:9:1: error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63805
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
I have similar error in LTO/x86_64, but stack is slightly different.
gcc-trunk r218991, binutils-trunk current
g++ -flto -o xx [6 files]. I'll try to reduce testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61670
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
r218716 FAIL for me
Fedora 21 x86_64
PR61670]$ LANG=C /usr/local/gcc_current/bin/g++ -fsyntax-only -fpreprocessed
au.ii
au.ii:3:3: error: expected ';' at end of member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64129
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug
101 - 200 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
