Hi
I have tried everything any page might say on this, still
stuck. Any help would be great
Hi all
I am trying to install 3.4 on my AMD turion 64 machine with fedora
core. But run into messages like this on gmake. Configure is fine
libbackend.a(builtins.o): In function `fold_builtin_cbr
08:11:35PM -0500, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> Hi
> I have tried everything any page might say on this, still
> stuck. Any help would be great
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to install 3.4 on my AMD turion 64 machine with fedora
> core.
You mean 4.3 (or rather a snapshot or svn c
Not 4.3 but 3.4 yes the older version. And I built and installed mpfr
and gmp. gmp4.1 and mpfr 2.2. I dont have a /usr/local/lib64 on my
system. Did my mpfr/gmp install incorrecly ?
dz
On 1/3/07, Matt Fago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You do mean gcc 4.3 right (either a snapshot, or from svn)?
. See 'config.log' for details.
And as matt suggested if mpfr is not needed by 3.4, how can I
configure it that way. --disable -mpfr did not help.
thanks for all the hints so far
dz
On 1/4/07, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-01-03 22:19:16 -0500, drizzle driz
Still no luck so far .. I got the gcc3.4 from the gcc archive. Any way
I can make gcc 3.4 not use these libraries ?
thanks
dz
On 1/4/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 07:25:03PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> In case you still get the warning after trying that, I
I configure with --enable-languages=c,c++ . Shudnt that disable gfortran ?
thanks
dz
On 1/4/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/4/07, drizzle drizzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still no luck so far .. I got the gcc3.4 from the gcc archive. Any way
> I ca
Hi
Does gcc do an divison by constant optimization for any 16 bit
architecture. Can anyone point me to where it does that ?
thanks
dz
Hi,
I am trying to find out how to insert annotations for certain array
references identified in tree-loop-linear.c so that when converting to
RTL they can be handled differently. I find that simply inserting a
flag in the tree node is not enough as optimizations later on can lead
to the node b
generating a pointer to it instead of using the array).
Sumesh
On 7/26/05, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 04:21:51PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
>
> >I am trying to find out how to insert annotations for certain array
> > references
for the answers
On 7/26/05, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 18:39 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> > I am not sure if I unerstand ...can you elaborate please ? So what I
> > need is if I identify say a reference a[i] inside a loop, I wan
build_function_call fail.
thanks once again ...
On 7/26/05, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:42 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> > What doesnt exist very long - the references ?
>
> By RTL, they've been expanded to pointer accesses.
>
> >
Hi
I am trying to insert a function call "foo" inside the tree list.
Inside this particular loop
for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi); bsi_next (&bsi))
{
//if a particular condition is satisfied I do the following
tree id =
Its inside this function
static inline var_ann_t
var_ann (tree t)
from the error dump itseems to the following assertion
gcc_assert (DECL_P (t))
thanks
On 7/27/05, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:33 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> >
Hi
Can some one tell me if gcc preprocessor can support in some way
the following
features
1. Repeating a block a certain number of times
2. Multiline macros with new lines
3. Setting a symbolic constant inside a #define
thanks
dz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:07:07PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> Can some one tell me if gcc preprocessor can support in some way
> the following
> features
You are asking a beginner C programming question. gcc's preprocessor
does what standard C preprocessors do.
Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:27:48PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> Ok can you tell me what directives does it provide to do what I
> have said . And I am not a beginner to gcc.
The answer is that gcc provides what the C standard specifies and
Hi
I am wondering how gcc handles producing debug information for
automatic variables that do not reside inthe stack.For example when
say register allocation decides to assign a particular register to a
variable or say it decides that the value is a constant. Can some
one point me to the rele
Hi
I am wondering if from a developer perspective some body can tell
me what debugging quality to expect when using -g with O3.
Especially when the following happen
1. When a variable resides in multiple locations in different scopes
such as different registers.
If this works very well, I am wo
July 2005 17:33, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > I am trying to insert a function call "foo" inside the tree list.
> > >
> > >
> > > Inside this particular loop
> > > for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi
Hi
I am inserting a call stmt in linear_transform_loops. Al though
the call statement gets inserted , the compilation breaks. Can some
one help me identify if I am missing some information in the call
node that I create (thanks Daniel for all the help until now)
here is the set of s
ECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:15:22PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
>
> > I am inserting a call stmt in linear_transform_loops. Al though
> > the call statement gets inserted , the compilation breaks. Can some
> > one help me identify if I am missin
Could it be that it being done lower in the pass unlike insertions in
tree-profile, gomp - some ssa defintion information is missing. The
reason I have been led to think is because it fails
register_new_defintions. I would appreciate any suggestions.
thanks
On 7/28/05, drizzle drizzle <[EM
If you are objective is to debug gcc, then all the necessary setup is
already done...Check this documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebuggingGCC.
dz
On 8/20/05, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 19 August 2005 20:26, Jiang Long wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I 'd like
Hi .
I want to use gcc's alias analysis in a standalone way. What I
observe is that a lot of the information is hidden because of
additional temporaries that have been generated. Can any one suggest
as to if there is a simple workaround to this ?
To illustrate what I am saying
for a stmt
24 matches
Mail list logo