[Bug target/114189] Target implements obsolete vcond{,u,eq} expanders

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/115883] [15 Regression] late-combine exposing LRA problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115883 --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou --- Are you sure about REG_POINTER though? IIRC the PA port does rely on it for correctness.

[Bug target/115591] internal error on global variable-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.2 Status|NEW

[Bug target/115591] internal error on global variable-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- Thanks Jeff! Any objection to backporting the fix onto the 14 branch?

[Bug target/115591] internal error on global variable-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > Just threw this into my tester. Figure ~90 minutes to get back the cross > results. Thanks! > I assume that if we go forward that you'll handle putting together a > regression test since it's Ada

[Bug target/115739] Building cross-compiler to sparc-wrs-vxworks fails since r15-1594-g55947b32c38a40

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115739 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- The fix is OK for mainline, thanks!

[Bug ada/115630] Bounded queue does not finalize controlled components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115630 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/115666] Cloaking access to subprogram in a record allows storing anonymous access-to-subprogram value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115666 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- I probably should have said "but nobody should write this sort of code."

[Bug ada/115630] Bounded queue does not finalize controlled components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115630 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ada/115666] Cloaking access to subprogram in a record allows storing anonymous access-to-subprogram value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115666 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/115608] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 when building with -mv8plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115608 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.2 Status|NEW

[Bug target/115591] internal error on global variable-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Jeff, this looks like an obvious fix given the comment just above the modified code, but only a maintainer can probably assess that.

[Bug target/115608] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 when building with -mv8plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115608 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- Right, but Solaris does it automatically so Linux can probably mimic it.

[Bug target/115608] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 when building with -mv8plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115608 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug target/115608] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 when building with -mv8plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115608 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-24 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/115591] internal error on global variable-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- The immediate fix is: diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc index c17141d909a..5e34dc92210 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc @@ -1702,7

[Bug target/115591] internal error on global variable-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/115535] negative value returned by 'Image for array with nonnegative integer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115535 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/115507] bogus Constraint_Error for Wide_Wide_Value with wide enumeration literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115507 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/115535] negative value returned by 'Image applied to array with nonnegative integer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115535 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/115507] bogus Constraint_Error for Wide_Wide_Value with wide enumeration literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115507 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|'Wide_Wide_Value failed for |bogus Constraint_Error for

[Bug tree-optimization/87332] [meta-bug] Issues related to Identical Code Folding (ICF) and Tail Merging (-ftree-tail-merge)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87332 Bug 87332 depends on bug 109817, which changed state. Bug 109817 Summary: internal error in ICF pass on Ada interfaces https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817 What|Removed |Added

[Bug ipa/109817] internal error in ICF pass on Ada interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug ada/114710] too late finalization of temporary object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114710 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/115376] ICE with if expression in value setting of a constant declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115376 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- > After trying and several attempts to find a small reproducer, I'm afraid > that I won't be able to provide better help than the ALS team could. Note that a small reproducer is not mandatory, so it's

[Bug ada/114708] [12/13/14/15 regression] internal error on access to an incomplete formal in generic package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114708 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.4 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/114398] [13/14/15 regression] Storage_Error with 'Access of primitive function returning limited type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114398 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/114398] [13/14/15 regression] Storage_Error with 'Access of primitive function returning limited type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114398 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e54d90911858174a0c528d2c06198bc2061b3b22 commit r13-8829-ge54d90911858174a0c528d2c06198bc2061b3b22 Author: Javier Miranda Date: Thu Apr 18 09:54:22 2024 + ada:

[Bug ada/114398] [13/14/15 regression] Storage_Error with 'Access of primitive function returning limited type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114398 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1bec0455fb6f871bbc2c80d6e19c90deebbf824 commit r14-10298-ga1bec0455fb6f871bbc2c80d6e19c90deebbf824 Author: Javier Miranda Date: Thu Apr 18 09:54:22 2024 + ada:

[Bug ada/114398] [13/14/15 regression] Storage_Error with 'Access of primitive function returning limited type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114398 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:add6d89eaed4070803882b9a0b643d963ca8d80a commit r15-1158-gadd6d89eaed4070803882b9a0b643d963ca8d80a Author: Javier Miranda Date: Thu Apr 18 09:54:22 2024 + ada:

[Bug ada/115376] ICE with if expression in value setting of a constant declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115376 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/115349] compiler infers the wrong Accum_Type for a Reducer expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115349 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-05 CC|

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- They might come from https://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gcc-gitref.cgi?r=r15-615 and, in particular, the change made to libgnarl/s-osinte__darwin.ads, in which case the way out would be to duplicate

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Version|14.0|15.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/115292] [15 Regression] i686-darwin17 bootstrap fails for Ada (between r15-856 and r15-889)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115292 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug ada/115270] GNAT tools do not link on 32-bit SPARC/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/115270] gnat doesn't link on 32-bit Linux/sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 58304 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58304=edit Tentative fix Please give it a try when you have a chance.

[Bug ada/115270] gnat doesn't link on 32-bit Linux/sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115270 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/115235] Non-standard .debug_addr section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > Hi, can you clarify what you mean? Why does -gsplit-dwarf without -gdwarf-5 > emit in debug fission with extended dwarf-4 if it's specifically dealing > with dwarf 5? The sentence is indeed a bit

[Bug debug/115235] Non-standard .debug_addr section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/115038] [14/15 regression] internal error in seh_cfa_offset with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/115038] [14/15 regression] internal error in seh_cfa_offset with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > Eric, do you want to handle the final bootstrap+regression test? Or do you > want me to take it from here? I can do it right now.

[Bug target/115188] New: [14/15 regression] invalid Thumb assembly for atomic store in loop on ARMv6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115188 Bug ID: 115188 Summary: [14/15 regression] invalid Thumb assembly for atomic store in loop on ARMv6 Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ada/115168] [15 regression] Several libada compile errors on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115168 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/115168] [15 regression] Several libada compile errors on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115168 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 58255 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58255=edit Tentative fix

[Bug ada/115168] [15 regression] Several libada compile errors on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115168 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/115038] [14/15 regression] internal error in seh_cfa_offset with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/115038] [14/15 regression] internal error in seh_cfa_offset with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization Keywords|EH

[Bug ada/115106] [15 regression] SEGV in sem_elab.internal_representation.nts_map.mutate_and_rehash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > However, I will comment that it maybe built but there are cats regressions > (1) on x86_64, (2) on i686-darwin17 (many) on i686-darwin9. No idea what > caused those at the moment - and my hardware is

[Bug ada/115106] [15 regression] SEGV in sem_elab.internal_representation.nts_map.mutate_and_rehash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/115133] [15 regression] s-oslock__solaris.ads doesn't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115133 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/115133] [15 regression] s-oslock__solaris.ads doesn't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115133 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58229|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78664] LRA must honor REG_ALLOC_ORDER to pick reload registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78664 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- OK, thanks for the explanation.

[Bug ada/115133] [15 regression] s-oslock__solaris.ads doesn't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115133 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58228|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ada/115133] [15 regression] s-oslock__solaris.ads doesn't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115133 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 58228 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58228=edit Tentative fix

[Bug ada/115133] [15 regression] s-oslock__solaris.ads doesn't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115133 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-05-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug web/115105] Document "Reimplement GNU threads library on native Windows" change on GCC 13 changes list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115105 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/115113] [15 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115113 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 Regression] Ada |[15 Regression] Ada

[Bug ada/115106] [15 regression] SEGV in sem_elab.internal_representation.nts_map.mutate_and_rehash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug web/115105] Document "Reimplement GNU threads library on native Windows" change on GCC 13 changes list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115105 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-05-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/64835] -fno-ipa-cp is inconsitently supported when attributes optimize or target are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- > Eric, gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c XPASSes on 64-bit SPARC since > > commit ffabce849033e57ebaf60029822b81e981681c21 > Author: Eric Botcazou > Date: Tue Nov 29 11:43:32 2022 +0100 > > Couple of

[Bug target/115038] [14/15 regression] internal error in seh_cfa_offset with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Tentative fixlet: diff --git a/gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc b/gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc index 2e15b05529e..84b9623058b 100644 --- a/gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc +++ b/gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc @@ -491,7 +491,7 @@

[Bug target/115038] [14/15 regression] internal error in seh_cfa_offset with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- It's the -ffold-mem-offsets pass messing up with the prologue and the frame-related instructions (so -fno-fold-mem-offsets is a workaround).

[Bug target/115038] [14/15 regression] internal error in seh_cfa_offset with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug ada/15614] Illegal program not detected, RM 12.1(11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15614 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/114964] Ada Address_To_Access_Conversions gnat_to_gnu_entity internal error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114964 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug go/114582] go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue34123.go FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114582 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug ada/81087] array index out of range in gnatlink, making test always false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81087 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- There is a fix in the pipeline for GCC 15, although I'm not sure if it will handle all the issues.

[Bug tree-optimization/114864] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Another instance is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453

[Bug tree-optimization/114864] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- Yes, this is a known issue in SRA, see PR optimization/111873, but it apparently shows up only with nonsensical combinations of switches so, well...

[Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou --- > The sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap (both multilibs) has just completed > successfully without regressions. > > However, sparc/sol2.h needed an #undef to fix > > In file included from ./tm.h:27, >

[Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- OK, thanks, let's go ahead for Solaris then, but I agree that we'd better do nothing for other platforms at this point. Do you happen to have some spare cycles to conduct a testing cycle of the above

[Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- Rainer, what's your take on this? Should we proceed and change the ABI on Solaris for GCC 14?

[Bug ada/114708] [12/13/14 regression] internal error on access to an incomplete formal in generic package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114708 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- This appears to be sufficient: diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb index 04d114694ab..f81380846e0 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb @@ -6076,6 +6076,12 @@

[Bug ada/114710] temporary object finalized too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114710 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/114710] temporary object finalized too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114710 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug ada/114708] [12/13/14 regression] internal error on access to an incomplete formal in generic package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114708 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/114708] [12/13/14 regression] internal error on access to an incomplete formal in generic package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114708 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/114708] [12/13/14 regression] internal error on access to an incomplete formal in generic package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114708 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/114640] ICE on elsif part of if-statement containing if-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/114640] ICE on elsif part of if-statement containing if-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- This appears to be sufficient: diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb index 04d114694ab..71cfdd718e0 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/exp_util.adb @@ -6549,6 +6549,7 @@

[Bug ada/114640] ICE on elsif part of if-statement containing if-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE on 'elsif' with complex |ICE on elsif part of

[Bug ada/114636] actual does not match formal in instantiation with formal package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/114636] actual does not match formal in instantiation with formal package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- This appears to be sufficient: diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb index e7b759c4e88..c06377ab4c9 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb @@ -6696,8 +6696,12 @@

[Bug ada/114636] actual does not match formal in instantiation with formal package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114636 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Actual does not match |actual does not match

[Bug ada/114593] [11/12/13/14 regression] bogus error on type conversion in instantiation of child unit inside generic child unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114593 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-04-06 CC|

[Bug go/106813] getSiginfo() libgo/runtime/go-signal.c missing Solaris specific code to get ret.sigpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106813 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug ada/114550] Weird error when iterating over a character container

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114550 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug rtl-optimization/114415] [13 Regression] wrong code with -Oz -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -flive-range-shrinkage -fweb since r13-1826

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114415 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ada/114065] gnat build with -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 fails on 32bit archs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou --- Nice work indeed, in an area that clearly needed it, thanks! Something potentially problematic though: +package body System.CRTL is + + -- In GNAT, Duration'Size = 64. + function Duration_To_int64

[Bug ipa/109817] internal error in ICF pass on Ada interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- It's not visible in release builds and testing shows that it's a very rare situation in practice, so no real need IMO.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78664] LRA must honor REG_ALLOC_ORDER to pick reload registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78664 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/54412] minimal 32-byte stack alignment with -mavx on 64-bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412 --- Comment #44 from Eric Botcazou --- > Thank you, Dmitry, but that particular solution may not be possible for me. > When I try compiling with -mstackrealign -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 > -mincoming-stack-boundary=5 instead of forcing

[Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > Thank you for the proposed fix! I tested it with several programs that I > used to find/reproduce the issue and it seems to work now (I talked about > this with Rainer initially). OK, thanks for the

[Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > Hmm, I just realized that you referred to the same sections, so my previous > comment might not make it clearer... Yes, the fields in question have array types so the rules about scalar values do not

[Bug target/112787] Codegen regression of large GCC vector extensions when enabling SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112787 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/88670] [meta-bug] generic vector extension issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670 Bug 88670 depends on bug 112787, which changed state. Bug 112787 Summary: Codegen regression of large GCC vector extensions when enabling SVE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112787 What|Removed

[Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 57806 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57806=edit Tentative fix

[Bug ada/114424] gnat: Ada.Calendar.Clock crashes on 32bit architectures with 64bit time_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114424 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- But s-osprim__posix2008.adb dies not use gettimeofday, does it ?

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >