[Bug target/116021] Ada build on Darwin: gen_il-main: Symbol not found: ___builtin_nested_func_ptr_created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- Ah, looking at gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in, perhaps the issue is that I need to set GNATLINK in my environment, too, besides just GNATMAKE and GNATBIND... perhaps the issue was arising due to having

[Bug target/116021] Ada build on Darwin: gen_il-main: Symbol not found: ___builtin_nested_func_ptr_created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- Well ok, could someone send me a binary x86_64 build of GCC for darwin20 with Ada support that they can bootstrap with successfully, then, so that I can get back to bootstrapping, too? Either that, or send

[Bug debug/96635] Feature request: PDB/Codeview support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96635 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/116021] Ada build on Darwin: gen_il-main: Symbol not found: ___builtin_nested_func_ptr_created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3) > You need to use an older Ada compiler (13 or older) for bootstrapping, not > any of the broken intermediate versions between Aug 2023 and Jan 2024. I wonder

[Bug debug/96635] Feature request: PDB/Codeview support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96635 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Mark Harmstone from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > The patches to support CodeView is being added (and improved) for GCC 15. I > > am not sure how much will be

[Bug target/116021] New: Ada build on Darwin: gen_il-main: Symbol not found: ___builtin_nested_func_ptr_created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116021 Bug ID: 116021 Summary: Ada build on Darwin: gen_il-main: Symbol not found: ___builtin_nested_func_ptr_created Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/96635] Feature request: PDB/Codeview support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96635 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at harmstone dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/116018] New: Feature request: #pragma GCC unpoison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116018 Bug ID: 116018 Summary: Feature request: #pragma GCC unpoison Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhancement

[Bug debug/96635] Feature request: PDB support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96635 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/6906] warn about asserts with side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/85563] [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm regression with __builtin_unreachable and GCC 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85563 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug driver/47229] Objective C and C++ compiler specific drivers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47229 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/68524] Please support attributes between function definition and opening brace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68524 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/115885] Build errors when libstdc++ math.h included in extern "C" block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115885 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/115880] [14 regression] GCC 14+ fails to parse CoreFoundation header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115880 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2) > I have posted patches (which need an update [on my shorter TODO] that > implement the availability attribute). That makes a fix unnecessary - I > would much

[Bug target/115880] [14 regression] GCC 14+ fails to parse CoreFoundation header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115880 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.4.0, 11.4.0, 12.3.0,

[Bug target/115880] New: [14 regression] GCC 14+ fails to parse CoreFoundation header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115880 Bug ID: 115880 Summary: [14 regression] GCC 14+ fails to parse CoreFoundation header Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/115735] Analyzer misses trivial syslog() call in signal handler for -Wanalyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115735 --- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #9) > Note that the POSIX list might not be redistributable, and the stuff in > glibc is probably under the GFDL rather than the GPL. Using glibc's is > probably

[Bug analyzer/115735] Analyzer misses trivial syslog() call in signal handler for -Wanalyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115735 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/115684] No warning for pointer and enum field comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115684 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > C++ has -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant . > Maybe it should be added for C also for at least C23 where nullptr exists > now. > > Note for C++, the enum value

[Bug c/115684] No warning for pointer and enum field comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115684 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/78352] GCC lacks support for the Apple "blocks" extension to the C family of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352 --- Comment #31 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #29) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #25) > > Cross-referencing against > > https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-libdispatch/issues/765 > > By the way,

[Bug analyzer/115662] New: Feature request: support for linking SARIF files together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115662 Bug ID: 115662 Summary: Feature request: support for linking SARIF files together Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: SARIF

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||valsiterb at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/79465] infinite #include cycle is not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79465 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97687] -Wfatal-errors prints some notes but not others

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97687 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c/80528] reimplement gnulib's "useless-if-before-free" script as a compiler warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80528 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||collin.funk1 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/78352] GCC lacks support for the Apple "blocks" extension to the C family of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fjahanian at apple dot com,

[Bug c/78352] GCC lacks support for the Apple "blocks" extension to the C family of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352 --- Comment #26 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #25) > Cross-referencing against > https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-libdispatch/issues/765 Note that there is some confusion in that issue about if/when

[Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951 --- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13) > > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12) > > > Patch posted that might help with this a little bit: > > >

[Bug c/71176] trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.c:162: bad % specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/98819] Wall Wformat-signedness suggests %u for %u

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98819 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/28492] -Wsuggest-attribute=format points to vsnprintf() or related functions instead of the function that needs the attribute added

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28492 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-Wmissing-format-attribute |-Wsuggest-attribute=format

[Bug middle-end/47081] Macro usage too clever for localization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug web/115391] Suggest add current size of git repository to git page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115391 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/112422] Build process does a redundant number of checks ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112422 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > There's some stuff we could cache for sure but it wouldn't be the majority > of the checks - stuff like finding tools like awk, sed should work > regardless of

[Bug c/115496] RFE: new warning to detect suspicious multiline string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115496 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/102223] no warning when calling member function on dangling reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102223 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Federico Kircheis from comment #6) > > are you expecting this to go under an existing warning flag, or a new one? > > Ideally -Wall, but there might already be some flags related to dangling >

[Bug c++/106393] Add warnings for common dangling problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106393 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/115409] avx512 intrinsics trigger -Wshift-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115409 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug other/15694] fixincl.sh bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15694 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- Also, there's a lot of `shellcheck` output for fixincl.sh, too; should I paste it here?

[Bug other/40789] fixincludes/fixincl.c: duplicate call to close ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40789 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > did you discover this with cppcheck or by looking manually? Also does -fanalyzer catch this?

[Bug other/37036] fixincludes does not understand sysroot!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37036 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/105719] RFE: fixincludes should handle Frameworks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug analyzer/111567] RFE: support __attribute__((counted_by)) in -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111567 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-06

[Bug middle-end/32911] Function __attribute__ ((idempotent))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32911 --- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager --- It might also be worth comparing against the attributes [[unsequenced]] and [[reproducible]] proposed for the C standard: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2956.htm

[Bug other/115268] gcc --target --sysroot support?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115268 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libbacktrace/115212] testsuite should produce DejaGnu style summary, log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > > I think there's another bug for this, but I can't seem to remember which one > > at the moment... > > PR 88002

[Bug libbacktrace/115212] testsuite should produce DejaGnu style summary, log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/77465] [DR909] rejected C-style cast involving casting away constness from result of conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77465 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/115077] bootstrap fails with in-tree isl-0.25/6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115077 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/93008] Need a way to make inlining heuristics ignore whether a function is inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93008 --- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12) > There's nothing fake about them, they are definitely inline functions as far > as the language rules. But in some cases we don't want the compiler to use >

[Bug c++/71482] Add -Wglobal-constructors warning option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71482 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6) > > Another reason this warning might be wanted: name mangling and demangling of > > global constructors has been

[Bug c++/93008] Need a way to make inlining heuristics ignore whether a function is inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93008 --- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8) > Reading the discussion again, I don't think we have a way to make inline > keyword ignored by inliner. We can make not_really_inline attribute (better > name

[Bug other/101166] Add SPDX license identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101166 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- The FSFE's REUSE tool could be helpful for this: https://github.com/fsfe/reuse-tool

[Bug tree-optimization/99475] [11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds accessing an array element of empty structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #8 from

[Bug c++/71482] Add -Wglobal-constructors warning option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71482 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #78 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #77) > Apparently fixing the message in GCC will produce maintenance overhead [1]. > If that's not very important to you, I'd rather leave this message as is. >

[Bug c++/114928] #pragma packed(push, 1) should give the same warning as __attribute__((packed))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114928 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/79646] Typos in vax.opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Abe from comment #4) > Anybody who wants to chime in, but especially Eric Gallager: please let me > know whether or not my patch looks good enough for submission to the > gcc-patches mailing

[Bug other/71760] libiberty - Segmentation fault when attempting to delete a non-existent element in a hash table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71760 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/88371] Gratuitous (?) warning regarding an implicit conversion in pointer arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88371 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/114588] Analyzer buffer overflow ASCII art hardcodes "RED" and "GREEN" as the terminal colors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114588 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/71482] Add -Wglobal-constructors warning option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71482 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug demangler/54254] libiberty: demangling for global constructor is broken since r167781

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54254 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > *** Bug 90039 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Symbol for this one was _GLOBAL__sub_I__Z11print_tracev

[Bug demangler/59518] C++ demangler does not handle some global constructor & LTO names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59518 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug demangler/54254] libiberty: demangling for global constructor is broken since r167781

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54254 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > *** Bug 56755 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** symbol from this one was _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN4AMOS12ContigEdge_t5NCODEE

[Bug analyzer/101713] -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive with GNU coreutils hash table code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101713 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/105474] GCC fails to bootstrap with --disable-libstdcxx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105474 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnings for lifetime DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #30 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #29) > (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #28) > > The bug is about the issue of lacking diagnostics, it should be fine to make > > note of various

[Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnings for lifetime DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #29 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #28) > The bug is about the issue of lacking diagnostics, it should be fine to make > note of various approaches to remedy the problem in one bug report. > OK,

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/12411] Missed -Wsequence-point on functions (example reduced from historical GCC source)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12411 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- I think the dup is a point for reopening

[Bug lto/110710] LTO linker on Windows creates an invalid Makefile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug libgcc/113402] Incorrect symbol versions for __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr in libgcc_s.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113402 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/102824] building pdf/dvi documentation for libgccjit fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824 --- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12) > what input is this waiting for at the moment? >From checking the bug history, it looks like Martin Liška was the one to put this in the WAITING status, which

[Bug other/114496] Documentation: "Non-Bugs" page should update/mention something about -Wsign-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114496 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- Maybe the update could be just to clarify the "EnabledBy" rules for the warning? i.e., something like "-Wsign-conversion is only and will only ever be enabled by -Wconversion in C, and we will never have it

[Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug tree-optimization/13756] [tree-ssa] documentation missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13756 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug c/109835] -Wincompatible-function-pointer-types as a subset of -Wincompatible-pointer-types?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109835 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > FWIW, after doing more of this work, I've decided I don't really care that > much about this one. > > I still think FP mismatches are often worse, but there's

[Bug target/42818] Static C++ linking breakage "undefined reference to ___real__Znwj" and others in libcygwin.a(_cygwin_crt0_common.o)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42818 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #35 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Дилян Палаузов from comment #34) > Created attachment 57662 [details] > Proposed patch > > This fixes the problem. > > I do not understand the build system to say, that this is the best

[Bug libgomp/66553] openmp tasks produce libgomp warnings with fsanitize=thread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66553 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: provide a TSAN instrumented libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnings for lifetime DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #27 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #26) > RFC patch for detecting lifetime-dse issues via Valgrind (rather than MSan): >

[Bug analyzer/105898] RFE: -fanalyzer should complain about overlapping args to mempcpy, wmemcpy, and wmempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105898 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|RFE: -fanalyzer should |RFE: -fanalyzer should

[Bug target/113679] long long minus double with gcc -m32 produces different results than other compilers or gcc -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113679 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/53929] [meta-bug] -masm=intel with global symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/80036] Source line not printed for diagnostic if expanded from a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80036 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/70730] Inconsistent column number in "error: attempt to take address of bit-field structure member"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70730 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/113414] Incorrent checking for printf format: does not distinguish whether the variable is signed or unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113414 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/67819] -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/89072] -Wall -Werror should be defaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89072 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/105401] Improved diagnostics for code from "Labels as Values" documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105401 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- putting the words "computed gotos" here for easier searchability

[Bug middle-end/37722] destructors not called on computed goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37722 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/78352] GCC lacks support for the Apple "blocks" extension to the C family of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/apple/sw

[Bug other/113168] ABOUT-NLS seems way out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113168 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/113019] [NOT A BUG] Multi-architecture binaries for Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113019 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/112973] Documentation for __builtin_preserve_access_index is not wrapped in extend.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112973 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/60512] would be useful if gcc implemented __has_feature similarly to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60512 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >