[Bug debug/102507] New: ICE in btf_finalize when compiling with -gbtf

2021-09-27 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102507 Bug ID: 102507 Summary: ICE in btf_finalize when compiling with -gbtf Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug debug/101283] Several tests fail on Darwin with -gctf/gbtf

2021-09-27 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283 --- Comment #20 from Indu Bhagat --- Commit https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f007a638a86e4b59bef0a0d8efa5bb8c5e5b200a added support for targets to opt out of CTF/BTF support.

[Bug testsuite/101269] [12 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c fails with its introduction in r12-1852

2021-09-27 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101269 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug debug/102195] Missing DW_TAG_typedef when using qualified variable of typedef'd array

2021-09-03 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102195 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think this is a dup of bug 8354. Possible. It looks like two distinct symptoms, but seem to be originating from the same underlying issue. I don't have enough

[Bug debug/102195] New: Missing DW_TAG_typedef when using qualified variable of typedef'd array

2021-09-03 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102195 Bug ID: 102195 Summary: Missing DW_TAG_typedef when using qualified variable of typedef'd array Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/101321] gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-3.c fail on arm-eabi

2021-07-06 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101321 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug debug/101283] Several tests fail on Darwin with -gctf/gbtf

2021-07-06 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283 --- Comment #18 from Indu Bhagat --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > It might make sense to provide targets a means to opt-out of CTF/BTF support > and thus diagnose -gctf as unsupported on them. Yes, I agree. It makes sense to

[Bug debug/101283] Several tests fail on Darwin with -gctf/gbtf

2021-07-05 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283 --- Comment #14 from Indu Bhagat --- With the two patches (commit r12-2044-ga3543b5e8002c033b2304d7ac1d1e58218eebb51 + the other in review) only two further failures remain to be looked into: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-3.c

[Bug debug/101283] Several tests fail on Darwin with -gctf/gbtf

2021-07-05 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283 --- Comment #12 from Indu Bhagat --- The intention is to be able to generate CTF/BTF correctly irrespective of the DWARF version. The case of DW_TAG_restrict_type is unique though, and looks like we will need special handling. To be specific,

[Bug debug/101283] Several tests fail on Darwin with -gctf/gbtf

2021-07-05 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283 --- Comment #10 from Indu Bhagat --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8) > > we are now left with (where I suspect that the remaining fails are an > > artefact of the way in which Darwin

[Bug debug/101283] Several tests fail on Darwin with -gctf

2021-07-01 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/101269] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c fails with its introduction in r12-1852

2021-06-30 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101269 --- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat --- Confirmed. This is reproducible with -m32.

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

2021-05-28 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- I found the issue. I will send a fix soon, once testing on powerpc64, x86_64 finishes.

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

2021-05-28 Thread ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 --- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat --- Thanks for the bug report. This is reproducible. Will look into it.