https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #15)
Its sort of like Steve said earlier. The coder is choosing to ignore an
error condition so anything gfortran does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This:
+fmt-format_string_len = strrchr (f-source, ')') - f-source + 1;
Is taking the difference between two string pointers, ie memory addresses
This:
printf(pos 0 =%x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
--- snip ---
Is the printing of 'YYY' supposed to happen?
Its sort of like Steve said earlier. The coder is choosing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
yes, I need to adjust the offset and width calculation. Updated patch is in
the works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Its not really a glitch. In this case reversion has occurred so i can only
approximate where in the string the error occured. I can improve on it with:
offset = fmt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think gfortran behavior is correct. The problem with the sample code is in
the lack of handling in subroutine BOTTOM. The loop is reading past the end of
the file. END
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33114
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33114action=edit
Patch to fix this issue.
Th eproblem was some use of pointers in a not so reliable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61640
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 7 03:35:09 2014
New Revision: 212319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212319root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-07-06 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61640
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 7 03:58:16 2014
New Revision: 212321
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212321root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-07-06 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61640
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61640
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 7 04:22:29 2014
New Revision: 212322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212322root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-07-06 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is nothing special about the 5227, more to do with array size.
I did go to the official mingw site and used thier get utility and installled
the latest of everything
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well I have been playing around a little. I wanted to see if the problem was
in pack, so I did this:
read( 10 ) matrix
write(*,*) nx, ny, size(matrix)
test = pack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here is a reduced test case. It has nothing to do with pack or allocate.
program readprint
implicit none
integer, dimension(319389) :: matrix
write(*,*) 'begin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK my misunderstanding. I thought the problem was that the program just hung,
which I did not see. Well, I can say I have something to look at anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The reason I asked about the windows version is that at work we just got all
upgraded to Windows 7 as a standard (vs XP) and we have been experiancing all
sorts of strange
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I went to gfortran binaries and grabbed the mingw installer and installed it on
my Win7 side.
Compile the program, Un compressed the data file and ran it.
C:\Users\jerry\prs
: libfortran
Assignee: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
The following fails on the read. Found while working on another bug.
program read_internal
integer :: x(9),i,iostat
character(len=512) :: iomsg
character(kind=4,len=30), dimension(3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61640
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One subtlety. If I change the read to:
read(source,*) (x(i), i=1,9) ! 9 instead of 6
I get an EOF with kind=4 but the read is OK with kind=1.
I am investigating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61640
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Full patch submitted to gfortran list. The problem found in this PR was masking
a problem in eat_spaces for KIND=4. Was missing some parenthesis for the
indexing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61640
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jun 29 02:49:45 2014
New Revision: 212118
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212118root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-28 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 21:11:20 2014
New Revision: 212089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212089root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-27 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Revision: 212060
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Jun 27 21:34:33 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 21:38:06 2014
New Revision: 212090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212090root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-27 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 04:23:36 2014
New Revision: 212059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212059root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 04:26:51 2014
New Revision: 212060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212060root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Janne, can you post some new benchmarks for comparison?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
$ strace -c ./a.out
% time seconds usecs/call callserrors syscall
-- --- --- - -
99.970.078667 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jun 7 17:35:35 2014
New Revision: 211345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211345root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-07 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jun 7 17:39:31 2014
New Revision: 211346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211346root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-07 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on Trunk, closing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56744
Bug 56744 depends on bug 55117, which changed state.
Bug 55117 Summary: Programs fails to read namelist (contains derived types
objects)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56744
Bug 56744 depends on bug 52539, which changed state.
Bug 52539 Summary: I/O: Wrong result for UTF-8/UCS-4 list-directed and namelist
read and nml write
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I will backport to 4.9 in the next few days so it will get into 4.9.1
I am not sure how your snapshot is set up. If it is using dynamically loaded
library, you may be getting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 26 15:19:36 2014
New Revision: 210934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210934root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-26 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 26 15:32:33 2014
New Revision: 210935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210935root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02065.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 24 19:26:02 2014
New Revision: 210898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210898root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-23 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 24 19:30:38 2014
New Revision: 210899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210899root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-24 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 18 02:29:27 2014
New Revision: 210574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210574root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-17 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 18 02:34:02 2014
New Revision: 210575
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210575root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-17 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have managed to get to a machine on the gcc compile farm to do some further
debugging. (gcc110)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61049
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed May 7 01:31:42 2014
New Revision: 210134
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210134root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-06 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61049
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed May 7 01:46:03 2014
New Revision: 210135
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210135root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-06 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61049
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32734
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32734action=edit
Patch pending
This patch places eat_separator back in but leaves the portion below
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61049
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One failure on NIST FM906.f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61049
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also confirmed it is r208629. Simple fix is to revert that patch and reopen
the original bug which is related to CTRL-D on stdin, PR46800
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32725
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32725action=edit
New preliminary patch - please test
This patch takes a different approach. I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Apr 29 03:13:34 2014
New Revision: 209888
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209888root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-28 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have to get my head around this. A user should not have to artificially
construct a string to accommodate endianess. Also, I think I see the buffer
overflow issue Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #15)
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #14)
Run it.
First, Jerry, I think you really should also compare the results against
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 26 21:52:26 2014
New Revision: 209828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209828root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 26 21:56:48 2014
New Revision: 209829
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209829root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Dominique, any progress on this one? Shall I look into it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 12 18:42:15 2014
New Revision: 209338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209338root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-12 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 12 18:50:53 2014
New Revision: 209339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209339root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-12 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 12 22:52:10 2014
New Revision: 209340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209340root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-12 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 13 02:05:02 2014
New Revision: 209345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209345root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-12 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
The libgfortran change is in all of 4.7/4.8 branches and the trunk now I
believe.
I am checking now. If so I will probably revert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The breakage is at r208528, investigating.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I would like to request the following be applied to the 4.9 release candidate
if possible. It reverts a portion of the original patch that caused this
regression.
I will then do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 12 00:04:41 2014
New Revision: 209329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209329root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-11 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk, waiting on 4.9, will proceed to 4.8 and 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60751
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I believe namelist writing is working correctly.
From the given test case and not deleting the file.
$ cat fort.99
nml str = a你好 /
a你好
This narrows down to the read side
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch part 1:
Index: write.c
===
--- write.c(revision 208887)
+++ write.c(working copy)
@@ -1835,7 +1835,10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #57 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Your results on Darwin match gfortran and ifort on x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Preliminary patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-03/msg00150.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #36 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks Good! I will commit the change in Comment #34 soon.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #37 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Mar 24 00:29:43 2014
New Revision: 208780
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208780root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-23 Dominique d'Humieres domi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46800
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41816
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30830
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36815
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 21 22:14:36 2014
New Revision: 208757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208757root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-21 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 21 22:19:44 2014
New Revision: 208759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208759root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-21 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
character(25) :: the filename
inquire(unit=input_unit, name=thefilename)
print *, The name is: , trim(thefilename)
Before closing the input gives a hint, but maybe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We can xfail the test case if we are certain of the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46800
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Revision: 208629
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Wed Mar 19 01:28:28 2014
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Revision: 208629
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Wed Mar 19 01:28:28 2014
1401 - 1500 of 2081 matches
Mail list logo
