Hi,
Projects, students and mentors for SoC 2006 are now listed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode
(you may edit it to link to your blog, website, or wiki page).
Cheers,
Manuel.
On 25/05/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel, I think it is not a problem that this info
Daniel, I think it is not a problem that this info appears also in the
GCC wiki, is it?
Thus, tonight, I will write it down in the GCC wiki for further
reference. If someone wishes to send me further information (links to
blogs or webpages), you are welcome to send it to my email address.
My inte
Hi,
I guess everybody is very busy. However, it would be nice to set up a
page in the GCC Wiki with the list of projects accepted for this year
SoC and some links. If someone has this information, I would volunteer
to "wikify" it.
Cheers,
Manuel.
PS: yeah, I am also interested part ;-) I would
Hi,
I was not able to find who is maintaining the GCC Wiki at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HomePage
I have found one strange problem and I would like to discuss it in private.
Thanks,
Manuel.
PS: I have noticed that Andrew Pinski is notified of page changes. On
the other hand, many changes have bee
Richard, if the documentation would have said explicitly that Werror
"makes warnings to prevent compilation", would you have understood it
better?
One proposal:
-Werror makes all warnings into errors, preventing compilation (see
also -Wfatal-errors).
On 12/05/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROT
On 10/05/06, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But then I just thought of another case:
template
struct foo {
foo(const Container& bar) { if (bar.size() >= 0) use(bar); }
};
For any STL-compliant container the test is redundant. But if
we put in a rule saying to suppress the warning if
On 10/05/06, Aliesha Finkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
template
struct foo {
foo(T bar) { if (bar >= 0) bar = 1; }
};
If foo is instantiated elsewhere then
this check could still be useful.
My opinion is that since it may be instantiated as an signed type,
then warning is pointless there.
On 06/05/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 4, 2006, at 4:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>struct C : A, B { /* ... */ };
>
> I am sorry to say that I don't understand the definition of struct C.
C is derived from A and B. Only valid of course in C++.
OK. This is multiple
Hi Grabiel,
On 26 Apr 2006 20:36:27 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope that does not fire up warnings for the following case and variants
struct A { /* ... */ };
struct B { /* ... */ };
struct C : A, B { /* ... */ };
void f(B*);
C c;
f(&c);
as the call t
Hi Ian,
I have submitted the project proposal to Google so it should be
available to GCC for review.
Although I cannot edit it anymore, any comment, criticism (even in the
language, I am not native English-speaker) would be welcome.
Cheers,
Manu.
On 26 Apr 2006 10:05:34 -0700, Ian Lanc
Dear all,
I would like to participate in the Google Summer of Code with GCC as
the mentoring organisation working in the project described below.
This is a draft of the project proposal I am preparing to submit to
Google. Any comments and suggestions (and criticism) are welcome.
Also, if someone w
11 matches
Mail list logo
