[Bug fortran/33271] nint_2.f90 abort compiled with -O0

2007-09-03 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-09-03 13:49 --- (gcc a.c -lm -W -Wall; try with -O0 and -O1, I expect it will fail only at -O0). One last question: in your build tree, you should have a file named ${builddir}/${target_triplet}/libgfortran/config.h. How does

[Bug middle-end/33277] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap check failures ICE's

2007-09-02 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 15:23 --- I am beginning to enjoy this: There are about 34 hours between the first indication of failure on regress an my report. There are about 8 hours between my report and the first acknowledgment by GCC. This came

[Bug middle-end/33283] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c fails at -O1 and above now

2007-09-02 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 18:57 --- Well here it is for interfering with Mr Guenther doing the reasonable thing. This arbitrariness and unwarranted interference led me to do this. It is also interesting to look a the GCC.mailing.list for June and July

[Bug c/33277] New: [4.3.0 Regression] Bootstrap check failures ICE's

2007-09-01 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michelin60 at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: rs600 GCC host triplet: rs600 GCC target triplet: rs600 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33277

[Bug fortran/33252] GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase

2007-08-31 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 14:52 --- FAIL: gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 -O0 execution test This one is annoying, I think I had it fixed (I saw it on numerous targets, and fixed it on most... I believed it was fixed on all targets). If you are willing

[Bug fortran/33271] New: nint_2.f90 abort compiled with -O0

2007-08-31 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
with -O0 Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michelin60 at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc GCC

[Bug fortran/33271] nint_2.f90 abort compiled with -O0

2007-08-31 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 15:36 --- While I am properly logged in I did not even try using the attachment ptocess given the difficulties Torsten and myself had with PR33126 and PR33252 -- michelin60 at gmail dot com changed: What

[Bug fortran/33252] GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase

2007-08-31 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 15:52 --- Regarding the last quote I am led to believe that Mr. Pinski is taking undue credit. PR30758 (marked as a duplicate) is the first addressing the re-appearance of mayalias. there are another 5 PR, all appearing

[Bug fortran/33271] nint_2.f90 abort compiled with -O0

2007-08-31 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 17:24 --- Could you compile with -O0 -fdump-tree-original and attach the nint_3.f90.003t.original file (or similarly named)? Could you also run with -O1 -fdump-tree-optimized and attach nint_3.f90.115t.optimized (or similarly

[Bug c++/33126] gimplification failed during stdc++ translation

2007-08-31 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 20:29 --- What is the official status of this bug? Mr Jelenik's patch made into the trunk and libstdc++ now at least compiles. Is that patch just a stop-gap measure and is final solution still outstanding? A status report

[Bug fortran/33252] New: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase

2007-08-30 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michelin60 at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc GCC host triplet: powerpc GCC target triplet: powerpc http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33252

[Bug fortran/33252] GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase

2007-08-30 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:23 --- Did not work as attachment with the following message: GCC Bugzilla has suffered an internal error. Please save this page and send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with details of what you were doing at the time this message

[Bug fortran/33252] GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase

2007-08-30 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 00:47 --- ( Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase /var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp. ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc This was fixed by: 2007-08-30 Jakub

[Bug fortran/33252] GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase

2007-08-30 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 01:43 --- (In reply to comment #5) First off don't CC anyone unless there is a real reason to like you know they caused the issue. Second most of the rest of the failures are PR 33225 anyways. First of all I CC'd Dr

[Bug fortran/33252] GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase

2007-08-30 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 04:33 --- (In reply to comment #7) Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put a stop to backporting definitely aggravating productive

[Bug libstdc++/33168] New: GCC Boot failure, building libstc++

2007-08-23 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
failure, building libstc++ Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michelin60 at gmail dot com GCC build

[Bug libstdc++/33168] GCC Boot failure, building libstc++

2007-08-23 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-23 22:28 --- Created an attachment (id=14097) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14097action=view) preprocessed -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33168

[Bug c/33125] New: ICE during boot

2007-08-20 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michelin60 at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: rs000 GCC host triplet: rs6000 GCC target triplet: rs6000 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125

[Bug c/33125] ICE during boot

2007-08-20 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-20 19:07 --- Created an attachment (id=14083) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14083action=view) preprocessed -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125

[Bug c/33125] ICE during boot

2007-08-20 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-21 00:48 --- This failure to boot perdures since since about 11.00 am. The extensive changes submitted by Chao-ying Fu did not change anything. Per telephone inquiry the same ICE occurs on a pentium3 but does not occur

[Bug c/33125] ICE during boot

2007-08-20 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-21 01:01 --- Pr 33126 by torsten.debian.org seems to confirm this, even as that build was for a cross-boot. -- michelin60 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/32988] New: [4.3.0 Regression] ICE in build2_stat, at tree.c:3081

2007-08-04 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
: [4.3.0 Regression] ICE in build2_stat, at tree.c:3081 Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michelin60 at gmail

[Bug c/32988] [4.3.0 Regression] ICE in build2_stat, at tree.c:3081

2007-08-04 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-04 16:09 --- Created an attachment (id=14022) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14022action=view) failing *.i -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32988

[Bug c/32988] [4.3.0 Regression] ICE in build2_stat, at tree.c:3081

2007-08-04 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-04 16:10 --- Created an attachment (id=14023) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14023action=view) OK *.I -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32988

[Bug c/32988] [4.3.0 Regression] ICE in build2_stat, at tree.c:3081

2007-08-04 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-04 16:11 --- Created an attachment (id=14024) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14024action=view) Failing *.s -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32988

[Bug tree-optimization/32873] [4.3 Regression] glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption

2007-07-27 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-07-28 00:00 --- Somewhat irritated by this plagiarizing the following come from my earlier PR32865 Unable to coalesce ssa_names 1221 and 144 which are marked as MUST COALESCE. is_long_double_1221(ab) and is_long_double_144(ab

[Bug c/32865] New: glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption [4.3 Regression]

2007-07-23 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
ReportedBy: michelin60 at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: rs6000 GCC host triplet: rs6000 GCC target triplet: rs6000 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32865

[Bug c/32865] glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption [4.3 Regression]

2007-07-23 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 13:48 --- Created an attachment (id=13952) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13952action=view) preprocessed vprintf.c from glibc-2.6 vprintf.c from glibc-2.6, glibc2.6.90, and glibc-2.5 differ in minor ways

[Bug c/32865] glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption [4.3 Regression]

2007-07-23 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 13:51 --- Created an attachment (id=13953) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13953action=view) Partial *.s output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32865

[Bug tree-optimization/32865] [4.3 Regression] glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption

2007-07-23 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 18:03 --- (In reply to comment #3) Stop changing the CC for this bug, the issue is a generic issue and most likely unrelated to any of the CC you added. This is more likely to be a PRE issue than anything else. When I get

[Bug tree-optimization/32865] [4.3 Regression] glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption

2007-07-23 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 18:33 --- (In reply to comment #5) Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption No, you do not. You submitted the bug. Let the GCC developers decide how best to triage and analyse the bug

[Bug tree-optimization/32865] [4.3 Regression] glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption

2007-07-23 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 23:17 --- Very interesting Using a colleague's i686 machine vfprintf.c did not fail with recent gcc-4.3. This led to further research prompting not only the CC's but also the quote. Dr. Edelsohn metioned triage

[Bug c/32742] New: ICE vector(vuse_vec,base) index domain error

2007-07-12 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michelin60 at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: powerpc GCC host triplet: powerpc GCC target triplet: powerpc http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c/32742] ICE vector(vuse_vec,base) index domain error

2007-07-12 Thread michelin60 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-07-12 19:39 --- Created an attachment (id=13904) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13904action=view) standard *.i file *.i file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32742