[Bug c++/65974] Bogus deprecated-declarations warnings for inline definitions of deprecated virtual methods

2015-07-06 Thread neil at fnxweb dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65974 Neil Bird neil at fnxweb dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neil at fnxweb dot com

[Bug libstdc++/25409] STL mt_allocator crash in global construcutor

2006-03-20 Thread neil at fnxweb dot com
--- Comment #7 from neil at fnxweb dot com 2006-03-20 08:48 --- Fair enough; for the record, I did spend an obscene amount of time trying to make the example more straightforward, but *any* simplification over what I attached worked OK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug libstdc++/25409] STL mt_allocator crash in global construcutor

2006-03-08 Thread neil at fnxweb dot com
--- Comment #3 from neil at fnxweb dot com 2006-03-08 12:41 --- Was it compiled up to use mt_allocator? I won't have the time to check again for a short while. If it's considered a good idea to use -pthreads, then it ought really to have it's info-page entry updated to not make

[Bug libstdc++/25409] New: STL mt_allocator crash in global construcutor

2005-12-14 Thread neil at fnxweb dot com
: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: neil at fnxweb dot com GCC build triplet: i386-redhat-linux GCC host triplet: i386-redhat-linux GCC target triplet: i386-redhat-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25409

[Bug libstdc++/25409] STL mt_allocator crash in global construcutor

2005-12-14 Thread neil at fnxweb dot com
--- Comment #1 from neil at fnxweb dot com 2005-12-14 11:44 --- Created an attachment (id=10484) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10484action=view) Example of the crash Do 'make' in top level of build tree. 'make symbolcheck' afterwards just demos the crash

[Bug target/24071] __gthread_active_p vs __gthread_once

2005-12-14 Thread neil at fnxweb dot com
--- Comment #10 from neil at fnxweb dot com 2005-12-14 11:47 --- For ref., I've just raised PR 25409 which may possible be a dup. of this problem. It's nothing to do with Solaris, though, so I didn't just add the details here. -- neil at fnxweb dot com changed: What