https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116086
--- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #6)
> Ah, thanks for reducing. I didn't get much further with cvise yesterday.
> What were your settings for it?
I used the normal settings (just --timeout to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116111
Bug ID: 116111
Summary: RISC-V: 'd' extension allowed with -mabi=ilp32e
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116086
--- Comment #5 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Ah yep that was it :)
Reduced testcase:
long a;
long b;
long c[80];
int main() {
for (int d = 0; d < 16; d++)
c[d] = a;
for (int d = 16; d < 80; d++)
c[d] = c[d - 2];
for (int d = 0; d <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116086
--- Comment #3 from Patrick O'Neill ---
I'm having trouble reproducing the failure. Here's my commands:
> /scratch/tc-testing/tc-compiler-fuzz-trunk/build-gcv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
> -O3 -march=rv64gcv -mrvv-max-lmul=m2 red.c -o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116085
--- Comment #3 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> Maybe add __attribute__((noipa)) for test() and merge the files.
That worked, thanks!
Testcase:
int a = 2;
unsigned b = 0x8000;
int arr_5[2][23];
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116085
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Tested using r15-2276-gd2fc64c8578
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116085
Bug ID: 116085
Summary: RISC-V: Miscompile at -O2 with zbb
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114665
--- Comment #11 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #10)
> Arg, no, disregard. I was just looking for FFB5 as a failure but I'm
> actually still seeing FFB5 for -O2, -O3, rv64gc etc.
Ah bummer. Hopefully
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116035
--- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #5)
...
> > Typically I use [14/15 Regression] if I'm sure it's a regression (ex. the
> > feature exists in prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116035
--- Comment #5 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> I assume this is a '[14/15 regression]', or does < 14 not support these
> instructions and you're using it just to say what's affected? If the latter,
> it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116059
--- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Thanks, I'll take a look at the riscv side and see what I can find out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114665
--- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Bisected to r14-3840-g88a0a883960 but that isn't the offending patch.
Can't find a baseline with --param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable so I guess
this isn't bisectable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116059
Bug ID: 116059
Summary: [14/15 Regression] Miscompile at -O2 since
r14-6420-g85c5efcffed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114196
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114916
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114665
--- Comment #7 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Retested using r15-2217-ga3f03891065.
It's changed slightly but is still reproducible on my machine :-/
> /scratch/tc-testing/tc-compiler-fuzz-trunk/build-gcv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116039
Bug ID: 116039
Summary: [15] rv64gc miscompile at -O3 with
-fno-strict-aliasing since r15-1901-g98914f9eba5
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116036
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Here's the assert that gets triggered:
/* We use multiplication for remaining cases. */
gcc_assert (
TARGET_MUL
&& "M-extension must be enabled to calculate the poly_int "
"size/offset.");
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116036
Bug ID: 116036
Summary: [14/15] RISCV: internal compiler error: in
riscv_expand_mult_with_const_int with -march=rv64idv
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116035
Bug ID: 116035
Summary: [14/15] RISC-V: -march=rv64g_xtheadmemidx_zba
generates illegal lwu insn
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116033
Bug ID: 116033
Summary: [14/15] RISC-V: -march=rv64gv_xtheadmemidx generates
illegal vse8.v insn
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115959
Bug ID: 115959
Summary: [15 Regression] rv64gcv ICE: segfault during GIMPLE
pass: vect
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115703
Bug ID: 115703
Summary: [15 Regression] rv64gcv_zvl256b miscompile since
r15-1579-g792f97b44ff
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115669
Bug ID: 115669
Summary: [15 Regression] rv64gcv -fwrapv miscompile since
r15-1006-gd93353e6423
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] ICE in |[15 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
This failure also appears when compiling glibc 2.39 with rv64gcv_zvl512b and
rv64gcv_zvl1024b.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
Bug ID: 115495
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in smallest_mode_for_size, at
stor-layout.cc:356 during combine on RISC-V
rv64gcv_zvl256b at -O3
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115441
Bug ID: 115441
Summary: Pointer/integer mismatch in __atomic_fetch-* not
covered by -Wint-conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115375
Bug ID: 115375
Summary: [15 Regression] RISCV scan failures since 2024-05-04
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115373
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Relevant postcommit issue:
https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/issues/999
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115373
Bug ID: 115373
Summary: [15 Regression] RISCV slp-cond-2-big-array.c
slp-cond-2.c scan-tree-dump fails since
r15-859-geaaa4b88038
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115372
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
debug output:
gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-4.c: vsseg3e64\\.v found 0
times
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/struct/struct_vect-4.c scan-assembler-times
vsseg3e64\\.v 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115372
Bug ID: 115372
Summary: [15 Regression] RISCV pr97428.c scan-tree-dump-times
after r15-812-gc71886f2ca2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115346
Bug ID: 115346
Summary: [15] Volatile load elimination with packed struct
bitfields at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115336
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115336
Bug ID: 115336
Summary: [15] rv64gcv_zvl256b miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115195
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Thanks Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115195
Bug ID: 115195
Summary: [12 Regression] Segfault when instantiating template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115143
Bug ID: 115143
Summary: [14/15 Regression] tree check: expected class 'type',
have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115142
Bug ID: 115142
Summary: [14/15 Regression] Unrecognizable insn in
extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 with -ftree-ter
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115123
Bug ID: 115123
Summary: [15 Regression] RISCV vector scan-assembler failures
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115104
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Relevant CI issue:
https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/issues/895
Commit Range:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114916
Bug ID: 114916
Summary: [14/15] RISC-V rv64gcv_zvl256b: miscompile at -O3 with
-mrvv-vector-bits=zvl -fwhole-program
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114734
--- Comment #14 from Patrick O'Neill ---
I'll send a patch with the testcase in a few hours. Testing it now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114756
Bug ID: 114756
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv32imc miscompile with -fdata-sections
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114749
Bug ID: 114749
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv ICE: in vectorizable_load, at
tree-vect-stmts.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114734
Bug ID: 114734
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv_zvl256b miscompile with -flto -O3
-mrvv-vector-bits=zvl
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114733
Bug ID: 114733
Summary: [14] Miscompile with -march=rv64gcv -O3 on riscv
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114665
--- Comment #6 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Binutils: #binutils-2_42 (c7f28aad0c99d1d2fec4e52ebfa3735d90ceb8e9)
QEMU_CPU=rv64,vlen=128,v=true,vext_spec=v1.0,zve32f=true,zve64f=true
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114665
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Reran as requested in pr114668. Still present with that fix.
I'll triage some other testcases and file those as well. Hopefully one of them
is a duplicate to this one that is easily reproducible.
GCC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114665
--- Comment #3 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Created attachment 57922
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57922=edit
Generated assembly files
Hmm doesn't look like it from my side - maybe there's some stack related
weirdness going
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114671
Bug ID: 114671
Summary: [RISC-V] -fvar-tracking -gas-locview-support -ggdb
emits a non-constant .uleb128
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114668
Bug ID: 114668
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv: miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114666
Bug ID: 114666
Summary: [14 Regression] Signed single bit comparison
miscompile at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114665
Bug ID: 114665
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv: miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114608
--- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(.BTF+0x88): undefined reference to `a'
^ This is the interesting failure line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114608
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Command:
> /scratch/tc-testing/tc-apr-4/build-rv64gcv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
> -fipa-reference -fipa-reference-addressable -fsection-anchors -gbtf red.c -o
> rv64gcv.out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114608
Bug ID: 114608
Summary: [14 Regression] Undefined reference in output asm with
-fipa-reference -fipa-reference-addressable
-fsection-anchors -gbtf
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114247
--- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Adjusted testcase:
union a {
unsigned short b;
int c;
signed short d;
};
int e, f = 1, g;
long h;
const int **i;
void j(union a k, int l, unsigned m) {
const int *a[100];
i = [0];
h = k.d;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485
Bug ID: 114485
Summary: [14] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114476
Bug ID: 114476
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114399
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Patrick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114399
Bug ID: 114399
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv32i miscompile
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* riscv*-*-* |riscv*-*-* aarch64-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Here's the result when running with -fwrapv on rv64gcv at O2:
> /scratch/tc-testing/tc-mar-18/build-rv64gcv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
> -march=rv64gcv -O2 red.c -o red.out -fwrapv
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Bug ID: 114396
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch at -O3
with -fwrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114386
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #0)
> ...
> Issue is not present when targeting risc-v.
This was in reference to tip-of-tree gcc - forgot to update this when I
determined the upper bound of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114386
Bug ID: 114386
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] Miscompile at -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #27 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #26)
> (In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #25)
> > It's still persisting on trunk (at least for pr113281-1.c
> > https://godbolt.org/z/M9EK44hKe)
>
> I looked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114314
Bug ID: 114314
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in common_handle_option, at
opts.cc:3356 with -fno-multiflags
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114198
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114198
--- Comment #3 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Fixed!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114195
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114196
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114196
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114261
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57640|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114261
--- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Created attachment 57641
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57641=edit
unreduced preprocessed testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114261
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Created attachment 57640
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57640=edit
Raw testcase and headers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114261
Bug ID: 114261
Summary: [13/14 Regression] Scheduling takes excessive time
(97%)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114200
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114249
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick at rivosinc dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114259
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114259
Bug ID: 114259
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp: internal
compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type',
have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114247
Bug ID: 114247
Summary: RISC-V: miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114198
--- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Probably also with -fwhole-program instead of -flto
Thanks! Updated args (--param=riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax was recently
removed):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114202
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Looks similar to pr114200 so it might be related/duplicate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114202
Bug ID: 114202
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv: miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114200
Bug ID: 114200
Summary: [14] RISC-V fixed-length vector miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114198
Bug ID: 114198
Summary: [14] RISC-V fixed-length vector -flto ICE: in
vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:10570
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114197
--- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill ---
found via fuzzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114196
Bug ID: 114196
Summary: [13/14 Regression] Fixed length vector ICE: in
vect_peel_nonlinear_iv_init, at tree-vect-loop.cc:9454
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114195
Bug ID: 114195
Summary: [14] RISC-V vector ICE: in vectorizable_store, at
tree-vect-stmts.cc:8690
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114028
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112971
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114028
Bug ID: 114028
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv_zvl256b: miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114027
Bug ID: 114027
Summary: [14] RISC-V vector: miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113796
Bug ID: 113796
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113607
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113607
--- Comment #6 from Patrick O'Neill ---
I think I may have messed up when copy/pasting the testcase. Please try this
testcase:
struct {
signed b;
} c, d = {6};
short e, f;
int g[1000];
signed char h;
int i, j;
long k, l;
long m(long n, long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113607
--- Comment #5 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Hmm that's odd. I just reproduced with tip-of-tree GCC.
> /scratch/tc-testing/tc-jan-25-reconfirm/build-rv64gcv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
> -O3 -march=rv64gcv red.c -o user-config-o3.out
>
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo