[Bug debug/53948] [4.8 Regression] Assignment line missing for -O0 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/53948] [4.8 Regression] Assignment line missing for -O0 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-16 20:23:20 UTC --- The problem seems to be that PARM_DECLs are not marked as REG_USERVAR_P.

[Bug debug/53948] [4.8 Regression] Assignment line missing for -O0 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-16 21:57:55 UTC --- Created attachment 27806 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27806 Proposed fix: Distinguish between a user variable and a function argument

[Bug target/53975] [ia64] Target register of a speculative load moved to a branch register prior to the chk.s instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug target/53975] [ia64] Target register of a speculative load moved to a branch register prior to the chk.s instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-15 21:08:30 UTC --- FWIW, as far as I understand the ia64 data speculation semantics, it is OK to use a speculated load, but the check must then be done on the use, i.e. in t

[Bug target/53975] [ia64] Target register of a speculative load moved to a branch register prior to the chk.s instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-15 21:17:34 UTC --- What does the recovery code at 4404710 look like?

[Bug target/53975] [ia64] Target register of a speculative load moved to a branch register prior to the chk.s instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-15 22:52:31 UTC --- Ah, of course the move branch register instruction faults if the NaT bit of the source register is set. So the recovery code is irrelevant, and this could

[Bug other/53961] internal compiler error: in memory_address_length, at config/i386/i386.c:23341

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/29533] Ada fails to vectorize even trivial loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29533 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/21998] (cond ? result1 : result2) is vectorized, where equivalent if-syntax isn't (store)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21998 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/53955] [4.8 Regression] Missing prototypes in i386.c, bootstrap failure with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53955 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/53908] [4.6 Regression] csa removes needed memory load

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/53908] [4.6 Regression] csa removes needed memory load

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53908] [4.6 Regression] csa removes needed memory load

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libobjc/53944] Can't catch C++ exception in Objective C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53944 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-12 18:23:33 UTC --- Try obj-c++

[Bug c/53924] New: unhelpful diagnostic in invalid declaration list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53924 Bug #: 53924 Summary: unhelpful diagnostic in invalid declaration list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/53924] unhelpful diagnostic in invalid declaration list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53924 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc

[Bug middle-end/53887] [4.8 Regression] ICE in hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true, at tree-switch-conversion.c:79

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/53547] Changing the source file between -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use can lead to performance degradation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53547 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/53887] [4.8 Regression] ICE in hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true, at tree-switch-conversion.c:79

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-09 18:53:39 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Mon Jul 9 18:53:35 2012 New Revision: 189389 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189389 Log: gcc/ PR tree

[Bug middle-end/53887] [4.8 Regression] ICE in hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true, at tree-switch-conversion.c:79

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53690] [C++11] \u0000 and \U00000000 are wrongly encoded as U+0001.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-08 20:23:40 UTC --- Test case: $ cat testsuite/g++.dg/pr53690.C // { dg-do compile } // { dg-options -std=c++11 } extern C int printf (__const char *__restrict __format

[Bug preprocessor/53690] [C++11] \u0000 and \U00000000 are wrongly encoded as U+0001.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |tromey

[Bug preprocessor/53690] [C++11] \u0000 and \U00000000 are wrongly encoded as U+0001.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/53881] [4.8 regression] ICE in hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-07 12:35:49 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Sat Jul 7 12:35:44 2012 New Revision: 189349 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189349 Log: gcc/ PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/53881] [4.8 regression] ICE in hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/53881] [4.8 regression] ICE in hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/53881] [4.8 regression] ICE in hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-06 23:28:55 UTC --- The problem is that the switch is not fully cleaned up, there are multiple case labels going to the same target basic block: (gdb) p debug_bb(e-src

[Bug fortran/53818] -fno-automatic cannot have initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/53804] New: branch reordering missed optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53804 Bug #: 53804 Summary: branch reordering missed optimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/53804] branch reordering missed optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53804 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-29 10:43:19 UTC --- On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, this case is optimized because the second branch condition is combined for both foo1 and foo2: bb 3: D.1723_4 = b_3(D) 0

[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/53791] Branches not re-ordered using profile-information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53791 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-28 12:05:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) The other trivially obvious possibility is to pattern-match this open-coded switch/case and transform it back to switch/case

[Bug gcov-profile/45891] Guessed profile needs updating after profile-read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45891 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/53791] New: Branches not re-ordered using profile-information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53791 Bug #: 53791 Summary: Branches not re-ordered using profile-information Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-26 10:47:05 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Tue Jun 26 10:47:01 2012 New Revision: 188983 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188983 Log: PR other/33190

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-26 11:27:47 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Tue Jun 26 11:27:41 2012 New Revision: 188984 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188984 Log: PR other/33190

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-26 22:21:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Learned some more. (For reference, this is all from Fr 17 Aug 21:29:16 UTC 2007 (revision 127595).) Not defined by any target

[Bug c++/50134] -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134 --- Comment #15 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-30 18:52:18 UTC --- This bug results in real warnings being introduced unnoticed, see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg02005.html

[Bug tree-optimization/18687] 200% compile time regression compared to gcc-3.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug middle-end/51389] GCC uses up to 75GB of virtual memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-27 23:14:03 UTC --- If this is fixed for GCC 4.7, why leave the bug report open? Do you plan to back-port a similar fix to older release branches?

[Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 due to expand's temp slot goo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-26 19:42:26 UTC --- Note, btw, that verify_cgraph() doesn't catch this. Honza, you loved checkers so much a few years ago -- maybe this checker (also yours??) should

[Bug target/53447] missed optimization of 64bit ALU operation with small constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53447 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/53447] missed optimization of 64bit ALU operation with small constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53447 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 23:15:31 UTC --- What does clang report for this: #include stdio.h void f() { printf( %. *d); } ?

[Bug regression/53442] llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with gcc 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 22:32:38 UTC --- Have you compared the linker command lines (using gcc -v)?

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 23:21:04 UTC --- Created attachment 27466 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27466 Pass around the location of the format string First, admittedly rather

[Bug middle-end/18927] O(n^2) compile time with -O0 (n= number of basic blocks) in local alloc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18927 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53125] Very slow compilation on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53125 --- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-17 17:55:01 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Thu May 17 17:54:52 2012 New Revision: 187633 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187633 Log: PR rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/53125] Very slow compilation on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53125 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53352] Incorrect CSE optimization on RTL expressions with a paradoxical subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/53352] Incorrect CSE optimization on RTL expressions with a paradoxical subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-17 19:09:14 UTC --- Mikael, is it possible for you to test if this is caused by this patch, please? http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=142443

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-17 21:19:28 UTC --- To fix this properly, the input location should be tracked for the format string. The location of the format string as argument to printf is available in c

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/53125] Very slow compilation on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53125 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias

[Bug tree-optimization/52054] Value-numbering does not enter translated expressions into the hash table

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52054 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/53125] Very slow register allocation on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53125 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53125] Very slow register allocation on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53125 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-10 22:17:36 UTC --- Created attachment 27369 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27369 Compute REG_LIVE_LENGTH smarter The way local_live is used to compute

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 19:03:01 UTC --- From gcc61: $ /lib/libc-2.7.so GNU C Library stable release version 2.7, by Roland McGrath et al. Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc

[Bug middle-end/53245] [4.8 Regression] ice in expand_case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53245 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/52391] [4.7/4.8 regression] genattrtab almost 5X slower for m68k than in 4.6 and earlier releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52391 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53245] [4.8 Regression] ice in expand_case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53245 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-07 13:57:49 UTC --- Duh! Index: gimplify.c === --- gimplify.c (revision 187219) +++ gimplify.c (working copy

[Bug middle-end/53245] [4.8 Regression] ice in expand_case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53245 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-07 14:40:43 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Mon May 7 14:40:33 2012 New Revision: 187248 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187248 Log: PR middle-end/53245

[Bug middle-end/53245] [4.8 Regression] ice in expand_case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53245 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/52391] [4.7/4.8 regression] genattrtab almost 5X slower for m68k than in 4.6 and earlier releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52391 --- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-06 21:40:18 UTC --- Created attachment 27328 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27328 Remove unused sched_branch_type stuff from m68k Patch speaks for itself

[Bug other/29442] insn-attrtab has grown too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/52391] [4.7/4.8 regression] genattrtab almost 5X slower for m68k than in 4.6 and earlier releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52391 --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-05 10:06:32 UTC --- Created attachment 27315 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27315 Avoid diving deep through generated IOR trees for EQ_ATTR This patch

[Bug bootstrap/52391] [4.7/4.8 regression] genattrtab almost 5X slower for m68k than in 4.6 and earlier releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52391 --- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-05 10:13:48 UTC --- Created attachment 27316 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27316 Difference in insn-attrtab.c before/after applyin

[Bug other/29442] insn-attrtab has grown too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442 --- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-04 20:04:56 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Fri May 4 20:04:47 2012 New Revision: 187181 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187181 Log: PR other/29442

[Bug bootstrap/37733] GCC Bootstrap fails in Stage 2 AIX 5.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37733 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug target/36732] Internal compiller bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36732 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/31603] gcc 4.1.1-r3 failed to rebuild himself without test useflag on gentoo 2.6.19-gentoo-r5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31603 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/29442] insn-attrtab has grown too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53168] ICE in find_or_generate_expression, at tree-ssa-pre.c:3053

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53168 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03 08:31:54 UTC --- I don't remember. Did you look at the paper/thesis to see if it says anything about this?

[Bug other/53178] fixinclude needed for iso/ctype_iso.h on Solaris 8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53178 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/53153] [4.8 Regression] ice in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6569

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-02 12:57:17 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Wed May 2 12:57:10 2012 New Revision: 187048 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187048 Log: gcc/ PR middle-end

[Bug middle-end/53153] [4.8 Regression] ice in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6569

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/53153] [4.8 Regression] ice in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6569

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/53153] [4.8 Regression] ice in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6569

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-30 17:11:15 UTC --- This is the early forwprop eliminating the promotion cast from char to int. I don't think this is a valid transformation.

[Bug c/53153] [4.8 Regression] ice in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6569

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-30 21:43:33 UTC --- Created attachment 27272 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27272 Eliminate unreachable case labels This is basically what the code

[Bug target/53087] [powerpc] Poor code from cstore expander

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Poor code for conversion|[powerpc] Poor

[Bug target/53087] [powerpc] Poor code from cstore expander

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-23 20:13:29 UTC --- Smaller test case: _Bool foo (long unsigned int a) { return (((1L a) 217579583UL) != 0); } == .file t.c .section.toc,aw

[Bug target/53087] New: Poor code for conversion from _Bool to int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087 Bug #: 53087 Summary: Poor code for conversion from _Bool to int Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/53087] Poor code for conversion from _Bool to int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed

[Bug target/53087] Poor code for conversion from _Bool to int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-23 17:13:28 UTC --- Expected code: foo: .quad .L.foo,.TOC.@tocbase,0 .previous .type foo, @function .L.foo: lwz 9,0(3) cmplwi

[Bug middle-end/53043] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr45830.c scan-tree-dump switchconv Expanding as bit test is preferable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53043 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/53043] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr45830.c scan-tree-dump switchconv Expanding as bit test is preferable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53043 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53034] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] tree-switch-conversion is too aggressive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53034 Bug #: 53034 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] tree-switch-conversion is too aggressive Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/53034] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] tree-switch-conversion is too aggressive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53034 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-18 20:25:45 UTC --- The gimple switch conversion pass is much too aggressive, worse code is generated for the examples that were used to introduce the implementation of switch

[Bug tree-optimization/53034] [4.5 Regression] tree-switch-conversion is too aggressive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53034 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/53034] [4.5 Regression] tree-switch-conversion is too aggressive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53034 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/45830] [4.5 Regression] Code+rodata increase with -ftree-switch-conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45830 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug java/52730] Java front end emits assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52730 --- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-29 21:00:32 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Thu Mar 29 21:00:23 2012 New Revision: 185977 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185977 Log: PR java/52730

[Bug java/52730] Java front end emits assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52730 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug go/52783] New: Go front end emits assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52783 Bug #: 52783 Summary: Go front end emits assembly Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >