[Bug target/109927] Bootstrap fails for m68k in stage2 compilation of gimple-match.cc

2023-05-24 Thread userm57 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109927 --- Comment #18 from Stan Johnson --- $ git clone git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git $ cd gcc $ git checkout master I'm testing a manual bootstrap of "gcc version 14.0.0 20230524 (experimental) (GCC)" now, accessed via git as shown above. It will

[Bug target/109927] Bootstrap fails for m68k in stage2 compilation of gimple-match.cc

2023-05-23 Thread userm57 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109927 --- Comment #14 from Stan Johnson --- I can try to capture the offending "cc1plus" and "as" processes just before the compilation of gimple-match.cc fails in stage2; the output will look something like this (for a different cc1plus process

[Bug target/109927] Bootstrap fails for m68k in stage2 compilation of gimple-match.cc

2023-05-23 Thread userm57 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109927 --- Comment #10 from Stan Johnson --- > The question is how much virtual memory is exposed to a user > process, that is - how large is the address space? I'm not sure, but I see this: $ prlimit RESOURCE DESCRIPTION

[Bug target/109927] Bootstrap fails for m68k in stage2 compilation of gimple-match.cc

2023-05-23 Thread userm57 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109927 --- Comment #8 from Stan Johnson --- > How much virtual memory does the m68k host have? Swap space in the m68k virt VM is configurable; I'm using 1 GiB in two 512 MiB partitions. I noticed that compilation goes further with two 512 MiB

[Bug target/109927] Bootstrap fails for m68k in stage2 compilation of gimple-match.cc

2023-05-23 Thread userm57 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109927 --- Comment #6 from Stan Johnson --- Thanks, let me know if you need me to check anything here. The problem has existed since at least gcc-12. Initially I thought the QEMU q800 VM had run out of memory, but switching to a virt VM with ~3 GB

[Bug target/109927] Bootstrap fails for m68k in stage2 compilation of gimple-match.cc

2023-05-22 Thread userm57 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109927 --- Comment #4 from Stan Johnson --- Adding more swap space doesn't help. The latest Gentoo update attempted to merge gcc-13.1.1_p20230520, and it failed while compiling gimple-match.cc in stage2. The error message is "virtual memory

[Bug bootstrap/109927] New: Bootstrap fails for m68k in stage2 compilation of gimple-match.cc

2023-05-21 Thread userm57 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109927 Bug ID: 109927 Summary: Bootstrap fails for m68k in stage2 compilation of gimple-match.cc Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal