[Bug fortran/109684] compiling failure: complaining about a final subroutine of a type being not PURE (while it is indeed PURE)

|| CC||wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org --- Comment #1 from Mianzhi Wang --- Created attachment 55103 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55103=edit slightly more simplified build with cmake

[Bug fortran/109684] New: compiling failure: complaining about a final subroutine of a type being not PURE (while it is indeed PURE)

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 54964 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug target/71615] wrong float point result with {-Ofast, -march=native, and valgrind}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71615 Mianzhi Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71615] wrong float point result with {-Ofast, -march=native, and valgrind}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71615 --- Comment #3 from Mianzhi Wang --- The bug disappears on an i7 3700k with the identical OS, GCC, and valgrind. Should be something related to the AMD CPU.

[Bug fortran/71615] New: wrong float point result with {-Ofast, -march=native, and valgrind}

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 38742 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38742=edit reduced test Problem: float po

[Bug libfortran/66385] ICE: FORALL writing multiple elements of one array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385 --- Comment #1 from Mianzhi Wang wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org --- The bug is bypassed by -fno-frontend-optimize, same as in the case of 66050 and 66386.

[Bug fortran/66386] New: ICE: FORALL reading multiple elements from one array

Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org Target Milestone: --- The ICE is triggered when compiling the following code with -O1 or higher -O levels. program test double precision::a(30),b(3,10) a(:)=1d0 forall(i=1

[Bug fortran/66386] ICE: FORALL reading multiple elements from one array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66386 --- Comment #1 from Mianzhi Wang wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org --- The bug is bypassed by -fno-frontend-optimize

[Bug libfortran/66385] New: ICE: FORALL writing multiple elements of one array

Component: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org Target Milestone: --- The ICE is triggered when compiling the following code with -O1 or higher -O levels. program test double precision::a(30) forall(i=1:10) a(10

[Bug fortran/66050] ICE: FORALL with operation on matrix columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66050 --- Comment #2 from Mianzhi Wang wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org --- I may have made some mistake on the original example. This should trigger the ICE (in some conditions, see below) program test double precision::a(3,3),b b=1d0 forall(i

[Bug fortran/66050] New: ICE: FORALL with operation on matrix columns

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org Target Milestone: --- The ICE is triggered when compiling the following (simplified) example with -O1 to -Ofast. program test double precision::a(3,3),b,c(3) b=1d0 c=[1d0,2d0,3d0

[Bug fortran/53885] New: seg. fault during assignment to allocatable component withing type-bounded proc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53885 Bug #: 53885 Summary: seg. fault during assignment to allocatable component withing type-bounded proc. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug fortran/53885] seg. fault during assignment to allocatable component withing type-bounded proc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53885 --- Comment #1 from wangmianzhi wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org 2012-07-07 12:08:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27758 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27758 a reduced example

[Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 --- Comment #8 from wangmianzhi wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org 2012-04-19 13:20:57 UTC --- if replace the input argument for test2() with pr, the program will compile but gives seg fault at run time. 于 2012年04月19日 09:04, janus at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 --- Comment #9 from wangmianzhi wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org 2012-04-19 13:22:24 UTC --- if replace the input argument for test2() with pr, the program will compile but gives seg fault at run time.

[Bug fortran/51736] New: generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51736 Bug #: 51736 Summary: generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer argument Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/49962] [OOP] ICE when using type-bound function returning vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 --- Comment #5 from wangmianzhi wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org 2011-08-04 18:07:07 UTC --- On 2011年08月04日 13:59, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed

[Bug fortran/49962] New: internal compiler error when using type-bounded function returning vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 Summary: internal compiler error when using type-bounded function returning vector Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/49962] internal compiler error when using type-bounded function returning vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 --- Comment #2 from wangmianzhi wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org 2011-08-03 14:24:19 UTC --- On 2011年08月03日 10:23, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 --- Comment #1 from Dominique