[Bug fortran/32147] Module file change due to order of writting out changes

2007-10-09 Thread wdobler at ucalgary dot ca
--- Comment #12 from wdobler at ucalgary dot ca 2007-10-09 08:05 --- I'll give it a try. But this may take a week or two, because my internet access is currently limited to times when I should rather do something else... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32147

[Bug fortran/32147] Module file change due to order of writting out changes

2007-05-30 Thread wdobler at ucalgary dot ca
--- Comment #8 from wdobler at ucalgary dot ca 2007-05-30 16:37 --- PS: The same probem occurred with g95, but is fixed now. I can reproduce this with gfortran, however, also g95 fails whereas NAG f95 has as only change the filename. The current version (as of 30 May 2007) of g95

[Bug fortran/32147] New: Module files change due to rivial changes in source code

2007-05-29 Thread wdobler at ucalgary dot ca
ReportedBy: wdobler at ucalgary dot ca http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32147

[Bug fortran/32147] Module files change due to trivial changes in source code

2007-05-29 Thread wdobler at ucalgary dot ca
--- Comment #2 from wdobler at ucalgary dot ca 2007-05-30 00:08 --- Created an attachment (id=13632) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13632action=view) .tgz archive -- unpack, cd, run `make' tar xzf gfortran-mod-irreproducibility.tgz cd gfortran-mod-irreproducibility

[Bug fortran/32147] Module files change due to trivial changes in source code

2007-05-29 Thread wdobler at ucalgary dot ca
--- Comment #4 from wdobler at ucalgary dot ca 2007-05-30 00:15 --- (In reply to comment #1) This should have been fixed with PR 31587 which was fixed on 2007-04-24. You are way too fast for me :-). My SVN version must be (slightly) more recent than 2007-05-01, so I doubt

[Bug fortran/32147] Module file change due to order of writting out changes

2007-05-29 Thread wdobler at ucalgary dot ca
--- Comment #6 from wdobler at ucalgary dot ca 2007-05-30 00:31 --- (In reply to comment #5) Note also your test case is not correct because there will be at least two differences always (the filename changes and the date). Sure, but that is documented in the README. And I just

[Bug fortran/31732] New: Assignment to array slice affects whole array

2007-04-28 Thread wdobler at ucalgary dot ca
Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wdobler at ucalgary dot ca GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31732

[Bug fortran/31732] Assignment to array slice affects whole array

2007-04-28 Thread wdobler at ucalgary dot ca
--- Comment #1 from wdobler at ucalgary dot ca 2007-04-28 09:00 --- Created an attachment (id=13459) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13459action=view) Short F90 program -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31732