Re: $RANLIB not passed to libiberty

2007-10-25 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Is there a way of using a different ranlib for building the stage1 compiler than for stage2 and stage3 (other than using a combined tree)? I don't remember one. Remember though that when using a combined tree you can drop in only the binutils directory, and use the system gas/ld. Paolo

Re: $RANLIB not passed to libiberty

2007-10-25 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:34:50AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: > > I'm having a look at building GCC with OpenWatcom to reduce build > >times. There seems to be something wrong with the build machinery: > > Can you try this patch? RANLIB_FOR_BUILD was defined no

Re: $RANLIB not passed to libiberty

2007-09-27 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: I'm having a look at building GCC with OpenWatcom to reduce build times. There seems to be something wrong with the build machinery: Can you try this patch? RANLIB_FOR_BUILD was defined nowhere, hence it was passed as empty to configure and detected (incorrec

$RANLIB not passed to libiberty

2007-09-26 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
I'm having a look at building GCC with OpenWatcom to reduce build times. There seems to be something wrong with the build machinery: $ diff -u {,build-i686-pc-linux-gnuaout/}libiberty/Makefile --- libiberty/Makefile 2007-09-26 17:02:58.0 +0200 +++ build-i686-pc-linux-gnuaout/libiberty/