Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:14, Mike Stump wrote:
I hate to even bring this up, but... should things like:
int m[1 27] = {0};
be put in .bss? I'm tempted to say no, if you want that, you have to
remove {0}.
What makes you say this?
I hate to even bring this up, but... should things like:
int m[1 27] = {0};
be put in .bss? I'm tempted to say no, if you want that, you have to
remove {0}.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:14:24PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
I hate to even bring this up, but... should things like:
int m[1 27] = {0};
be put in .bss? I'm tempted to say no, if you want that, you have to
remove {0}.
Does this answer your question?
`-fno-zero-initialized-in-bss'
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:14, Mike Stump wrote:
I hate to even bring this up, but... should things like:
int m[1 27] = {0};
be put in .bss? I'm tempted to say no, if you want that, you have to
remove {0}.
What makes you say this?
Given that C requires global variables without
I hate to even bring this up, but... should things like:
int m[1 27] = {0};
be put in .bss? I'm tempted to say no, if you want that, you have to
remove {0}.
Yes if -fzero-initialized-in-bss is on which it is by default since at least
3.4.0.
-- Pinski
