On 12/11/06, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:42:35PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:27:07AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Hey, by chance does the attached fix it?
> >
>
> Yes, it fixes 464.h264ref with the test input. I am running the real
> i
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:42:35PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:27:07AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Hey, by chance does the attached fix it?
> >
>
> Yes, it fixes 464.h264ref with the test input. I am running the real
> input now.
>
It works for 464.h264ref with the r
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:42:35PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:27:07AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Hey, by chance does the attached fix it?
> >
>
> Yes, it fixes 464.h264ref with the test input. I am running the real
> input now.
>
Do you need a testcase for your fix
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:27:07AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Hey, by chance does the attached fix it?
>
Yes, it fixes 464.h264ref with the test input. I am running the real
input now.
Thanks.
H.J.
---
>
> On 12/10/06, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 12/10/06, H. J. Lu <[EMA
Hey, by chance does the attached fix it?
On 12/10/06, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/10/06, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006
> Reply-To:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Do you have access to SPEC CPU 2006?
No, i don't, only SPEC CPU 2000.
> Your patch
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
On 12/10/06, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006
Reply-To:
Hi Daniel,
Do you have access to SPEC CPU 2006?
No, i don't, only SPEC CPU 2000.
Your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00225.html
causes gcc 4.3 to miscompile 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 with
-O2 -ffast-mat
