On 14/08/06, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does this mean that I should remove the corresponding code from
gcc/c-typeck.c:convert_arguments() and also remove
gcc.dg/dfp/Wconversion-2.c ?
add also the testcase gcc.dg/dfp/wtr-conversion-1.c to the list.
On 14/08/06, Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It makes sense to have warnings about calls where default argument
promotions would have made a difference, but not for the calls in
gcc.dg/dfp/Wconversion-2.c.
But there are no default promotions for decimal float, as you say in
your previ
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:45:55PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:30:26PM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> > 3) The above question may not have a sensible answer. It may be either
> > because decimal float "is a GCC extensions and thus not relevant to
> > traditional C
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:30:26PM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Wtraditional warns for "Conversions by prototypes between
> fixed/floating point values and vice versa. The absence
> of these prototypes when compiling with traditional C would cause
> serious prob
Dear all,
Wtraditional warns for "Conversions by prototypes between
fixed/floating point values and vice versa. The absence
of these prototypes when compiling with traditional C would cause
serious problems. "
In addition, the following program:
void ffloat(float x);
void h(void
