Hi,
I have made changes for feedback points 3 and 10.
With this I have completed/ made changes for points
1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.
I have pushed the changes to the repo. Please find the diff file
attached herewith.
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 7:50 PM Hrishi
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback.
I have made the corrections for the feedback points:
1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12.
I am working on the remaining points.
I have pushed the changes to the repo (lto-dump-tool-v4 branch) and
attached the diff file herewith.
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Wed, Aug 15,
Hi.
After last update of the branch, there's a feedback that will be needed
before we can adept to have it merged into trunk:
1) there's patch for lto-dump proper install:
diff --git a/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in b/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in
index e474f85ebc6..e9d2659025c 100644
--- a/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in
++
Hi,
Thanks for inputs and feedback. As per feedback, I have made all the
corrections/changes to the best of my understanding. Please find
details of the same given below.:
1) options of lto-dump:
a) removed the no-demangle command line option as it is default.
b) exit added after every dump. (to m
Hi.
I decided to come up with a new sub-thread that will be linked
to a root of email discussion. First, thank you for working on
the project and there's a feedback that I can provide now:
1) options of lto-dump:
a) no-demangle - does not make sense because it's default
b) you should exit a
Hi,
I tried doing as suggested
+ dfi.pflags = 0;
+ dump_switch_p_1 (arg, &dfi, false);
1.> the value of dfi.pflags is not changing even if different command
line options are passed like -fdump-blocks or -fdump-vops
2.> what is the significance of bool doglob?
Please find the diff file attac
On 07/16/2018 05:44 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As suggested I have created command line option -optimized=[none,
> blocks, stats, vops] to dump the respective gimple bodies of all
> functions.
>
> for example:
>
> -optimized=blocks will dump
Hi.
The name does not make much sense
Hi,
As suggested I have created command line option -optimized=[none,
blocks, stats, vops] to dump the respective gimple bodies of all
functions.
for example:
-optimized=blocks will dump
Gimple body of function: main
main ()
{
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
;;pred: ENTRY
printf ("
On 07/12/2018 08:05 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have added command line options:
>
> -body=
> To dump gimple body (TDF_NONE) of specific function.
>
> -optimized-blocks=
> To dump gimple body (TDF_BLOCKS) of specific function.
>
> -optimized-stats=
> To dump gimple body (TDF_STAT
Hi,
Thanks for suggestions. I would start working on these points and will
try to complete as early as possible.
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 09:50 AM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The command line option -gimple-stats will
On 07/09/2018 09:50 AM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The command line option -gimple-stats will dump the statistics of
> gimple statements.
>
> For example:
>
> $ ../stage1-build/gcc/lto-dump test_hello.o -gimple-stats
>
> will dump:
>
> GIMPLE statements
> Kind Stmts
Hi,
Thanks for suggestions. I have started incorporating them. As a first:
I have added command line options:
-print-size to print the size of functions and variables
size of variables is in bits and size of functions is represented as
number of basic blocks.
-print-value to print the value of
On 06/27/2018 10:06 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have added new command line options:
> -no-demangle -> for the default non demangled output
> -no-sort -> for the list of symbols in order of their occurrence
> -alpha-sort -> for the list of symbols in their alphabetical order
> -reve
On 06/26/2018 09:45 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created another branch lto-dump-tool-improved as suggested.
> I have applied the patch for separation to lto-dump binary, made a few
> necessary changes in other files and it is running successfully.
> I will keep on adding previo
On 06/18/2018 10:45 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to isolate the dump tool into real lto-dump tool. I have
>> started with the copy&paste of lto.c into lto-dump.c and done the
>> changes to Make-lang.in and config-lang.i
Hi.
There were some questions from Hrishikesh about requested goals
of the project. Thus I would like to specify what I'm aware of:
1) symbol table
- list all symbols
- print details info about a symbol (symtab_node::debug)
- print GIMPLE body of a function
- I would like to see sup
On 06/20/2018 07:23 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find the diff file for dumping tree type stats attached here with.
>
> example:
>
> $ ../stage1-build/gcc/lto1 test_hello.o -fdump-lto-tree-type-stats
> Reading object files: test_hello.o
> integer_type3
> pointer_ty
Hi,
Please find the diff file for dumping tree type stats attached here with.
example:
$ ../stage1-build/gcc/lto1 test_hello.o -fdump-lto-tree-type-stats
Reading object files: test_hello.o
integer_type3
pointer_type3
array_type1
function_type4
I have pushed the c
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to isolate the dump tool into real lto-dump tool. I have
> started with the copy&paste of lto.c into lto-dump.c and done the
> changes to Make-lang.in and config-lang.in suggested by Martin (patch
> attached). However when I
Hi,
I am trying to isolate the dump tool into real lto-dump tool. I have
started with the copy&paste of lto.c into lto-dump.c and done the
changes to Make-lang.in and config-lang.in suggested by Martin (patch
attached). However when I try to build, I get the following error:
In file included from
Hi.
There's working patch that really generates lto-dump binary.
Martin
diff --git a/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in b/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in
index 46950776dd2..502afe94851 100644
--- a/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in
+++ b/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in
@@ -21,10 +21,14 @@
# The name of the LTO compiler.
LTO_EXE = lto1$(exe
On 06/12/2018 06:22 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
I tried tweaking the make file. I am probably missing something. Please advise.
Hi.
Next time please send diff. It's easier to read it. You'll need something like:
diff --git a/gcc/lto/config-lang.in b/gcc/lto/config-lang.in
index 7cb7a7
Hi,
I tried tweaking the make file. I am probably missing something. Please advise.
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 07:16 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> -fdump-lto-body=foo
>> will dump gimple body of the function foo
>>
>>
On 06/08/2018 07:16 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -fdump-lto-body=foo
> will dump gimple body of the function foo
>
> foo (int a, int b)
> {
>[local count: 1073741825]:
> _3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
> return _3;
>
> }
>
> Please find the diff file attached herewith.
>
> Regards,
>
On 8 June 2018 at 22:46, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -fdump-lto-body=foo
> will dump gimple body of the function foo
>
> foo (int a, int b)
> {
>[local count: 1073741825]:
> _3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
> return _3;
>
> }
>
> Please find the diff file attached herewith.
@@ -53,10 +55,14
Hi,
-fdump-lto-body=foo
will dump gimple body of the function foo
foo (int a, int b)
{
[local count: 1073741825]:
_3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
return _3;
}
Please find the diff file attached herewith.
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 03:
On 06/08/2018 03:40 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> There's wrong declaration of the function in header file. I'll fix it soon
> on trunk. Please carry on with following patch:
Fixed in r261327.
Martin
On 06/08/2018 03:27 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Linking is not taking place as the debug_function() being used is in
> tree-cfg.c. How should I go about on adding in make-file considering
> the dependencies?
Hi.
There's wrong declaration of the function in header file. I'll fix it s
Hi,
Linking is not taking place as the debug_function() being used is in
tree-cfg.c. How should I go about on adding in make-file considering
the dependencies?
Please find the diff file attached herewith.
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:38 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 06/04/2018
On 06/04/2018 08:13 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
-fdump-lto-list will dump all the symbol list
I see extra new lines in the output:
$ lto1 -fdump-lto-list main.o
[..snip..]
Symbol Table
NameTypeVisibility
fwrite/15function
Hi,
-fdump-lto-list will dump all the symbol list
-fdump-lto-list -demangle will dump all the list with symbol names demangled
-fdump-lto-symbol=foo will dump details of foo
The output(demangled) will be in tabular form like nm:
Symbol Table
Name Type Visibility
On 06/01/2018 08:59 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> I have pushed the changes to github
> (https://github.com/hrisearch/gcc). Added a command line option for
> specific dumps of variables and functions used in IL e.g.
> -fdump-lto-list=foo will dump:
> Call Graph:
>
> foo/1 (foo)
> Type:
Hi,
I have pushed the changes to github
(https://github.com/hrisearch/gcc). Added a command line option for
specific dumps of variables and functions used in IL e.g.
-fdump-lto-list=foo will dump:
Call Graph:
foo/1 (foo)
Type: function
visibility: default
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Tue, May 29, 2
On 05/29/2018 07:38 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
$ nm main.o
T main
T mystring
C pole
Or we can be inspired by readelf:
$ readelf -s a.out
[snip]
Symbol table '.symtab' contains 74 entries:
Num:Value Size TypeBind Vis Ndx Name
66: 00
On 05/29/2018 07:17 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Shouldn't fdump-lto-list be enabled only if fdump is enabled ?
The option is dummy, and eventually all do options will be moved
to a separate tool called lto-dump. Thus all the prefixed '-fdump-lto-foo'
will be replaced with -foo is guess.
Ma
On 05/29/2018 07:03 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
My exams have finally ended and I have started working on the GSOC project.
I have forked GCC mirror (https://github.com/hrisearch/gcc) and
created a option for dumping functions and variables used in IL.
Please find the patch attached herew
On 29 May 2018 at 22:33, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My exams have finally ended and I have started working on the GSOC project.
> I have forked GCC mirror (https://github.com/hrisearch/gcc) and
> created a option for dumping functions and variables used in IL.
> Please find the patch att
Hi,
My exams have finally ended and I have started working on the GSOC project.
I have forked GCC mirror (https://github.com/hrisearch/gcc) and
created a option for dumping functions and variables used in IL.
Please find the patch attached herewith.
Regards,
Hrishikesh
diff --git a/gcc/lto/lang.o
38 matches
Mail list logo
