On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
To me predicate (and capture without expression or predicate)
differs from expression in that predicate is clearly a leaf of the
expression tree while we have to recurse into
Hi,
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
Syntaxwise I had this idea for adding generic predicates to expressions:
(plus (minus @0 @1):predicate
@2)
(...)
So you'd write
(plus @0 :integer_zerop)
instead of
(plus @0 integer_zerop)
?
plus is binary, where is
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
Syntaxwise I had this idea for adding generic predicates to expressions:
(plus (minus @0 @1):predicate
@2)
(...)
So you'd write
(plus @0 :integer_zerop)
Hi,
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
To me predicate (and capture without expression or predicate)
differs from expression in that predicate is clearly a leaf of the
expression tree while we have to recurse into expression operands.
Now, if we want to support applying predicates
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM,
So I came along the need to add another predicate for REAL_CST
leafs which makes me wonder if we should support tree codes
as predicates. Thus instead of writing
(match_and_simplify
(plus (plus @0 INTEGER_CST_P@1) INTEGER_CST_P@2)
(plus @0 (plus @1 @2)))
write
(match_and_simplify
* I have written test-cases for patterns in match.pd (attached patch), which
result in PASS. Could you review them for me ?
Sure. It looks good to me, though you can look at the changed match-1.c
testcase on the branch where I've changed the matching to look for the
debug output the
Prathamesh Kulkarni bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com writes:
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump gimple_match_and_simplified to \[^\n\r\]*=
x_\\d\+\\(D\\) - y_\\d\+\\(D\\) forwprop1 } } */
No need to quote +, it's not special to tcl.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:10 PM,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM,
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:10 PM,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM,
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM,
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Prathamesh Kulkarni bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com writes:
a) I am not able to follow why 3 slashes are required here
in
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
Prathamesh Kulkarni
Hi,
I was trying to write test-case for the pattern A + -B - A - B
(currently written for only int type).
Is the test-case written correctly (attached) ?
a) I am not able to follow why 3 slashes are required here
in x_.\\\(D\\\) ? Why does x_.\(D\) not work ?
(I saw 3 slashes used in a
Prathamesh Kulkarni bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com writes:
a) I am not able to follow why 3 slashes are required here
in x_.\\\(D\\\) ? Why does x_.\(D\) not work ?
Two of the three backslashes are eaten by the tcl parser. But actually
only two backslashes are needed, since the parens are not
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Prathamesh Kulkarni bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com writes:
a) I am not able to follow why 3 slashes are required here
in x_.\\\(D\\\) ? Why does x_.\(D\) not work ?
Two of the three backslashes are eaten by the tcl
21 matches
Mail list logo
