Re: [Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Documenting GCC 4.2 changes

2007-03-27 Thread Richard Sandiford
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now that the gcc 4.2 release is getting closer, I am resending this > e-mail from Martin Michlmayr. I've removed options which I believe > are sufficiently internal to not require mention in the changes file, > and I've removed options which are now d

Re: [Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Documenting GCC 4.2 changes

2007-03-26 Thread Eric Botcazou
> So why is it there? Compatibility with some other compiler? To work around some laziness in libgomp. :-) Other platforms only have -pthread it seems. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: [Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Documenting GCC 4.2 changes

2007-03-26 Thread Joe Buck
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:28:44PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > 2006-02-07 Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > config/sol26.h (CPP_SUBTARGET_SPEC): Accept -pthread. > > doc/invoke.texi (SPARC options): Document -pthread. > > It's only an alias for the existing -pthreads, not worth mentionin

Re: [Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Documenting GCC 4.2 changes

2007-03-26 Thread Eric Botcazou
> 2006-02-07 Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > config/sol26.h (CPP_SUBTARGET_SPEC): Accept -pthread. > doc/invoke.texi (SPARC options): Document -pthread. It's only an alias for the existing -pthreads, not worth mentioning IMO. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: [Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Documenting GCC 4.2 changes

2007-03-23 Thread Brooks Moses
(crossposting to fortran@) Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Now that the gcc 4.2 release is getting closer, I am resending this e-mail from Martin Michlmayr. I've removed options which I believe are sufficiently internal to not require mention in the changes file, and I've removed options which are now

[Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Documenting GCC 4.2 changes

2007-03-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Now that the gcc 4.2 release is getting closer, I am resending this e-mail from Martin Michlmayr. I've removed options which I believe are sufficiently internal to not require mention in the changes file, and I've removed options which are now documented there. Many of our users only discover new