Hi,
Regarding the PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29413
Is below patch adequate to fix the problem?
Works fine with me, but haven't done any regression test.
Thanks in Advance
(Hiroki Kaminaga)
t
--
Index: gcc/gcc/config/mips/mips.h
===
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 17:06 +0900, Hiroki Kaminaga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Regarding the PR:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29413
>
> Is below patch adequate to fix the problem?
> Works fine with me, but haven't done any regression test.
As I mentioned in the bug report, the problem is t
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As I mentioned in the bug report, the problem is that CC1_SPEC
> is the wrong one.
(snip)
> The attached patch is the more correct way to solve this.
Thanks alot!
(Hiroki Kaminaga)
t
--
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 17:06 +0900, Hiroki Kaminaga wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding the PR:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29413
> >
> > Is below patch adequate to fix the problem?
> > Works fine with me, but haven't done any regression t
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:32 +0900, Hiroki Kaminaga wrote:
> > The attached patch is the more correct way to solve this.
>
> Your patch would cause `-profile' option not to set `-p' to cc1. Is this OK?
Not really, the following patch on top of the previous fixes the above
problem:
Index: config/mip
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Your patch would cause `-profile' option not to set `-p' to cc1. Is this OK?
> Not really, the following patch on top of the previous fixes the above
> problem:
> Index: config/mips/linux.h
> ===
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:45 +0900, Hiroki Kaminaga wrote:
> How about appending to CC1_SPEC?
>
> -#ifndef CC1_SPEC
> +#undef CC1_SPEC
> #define CC1_SPEC "\
> %{gline:%{!g:%{!g0:%{!g1:%{!g2: -g1} \
> %{G*} %{EB:-meb} %{EL:-mel} %{EB:%{EL:%emay not use both -EB and -EL}} \
> %{save-temps: }
