On Wednesday 13 April 2005 21:19, Roger Sayle wrote:
> A slightly better approach would be to include the dejagnu
> testsuite in the coverage analysis, as the preferred policy of
> adding a new testcase to trigger each transformation/optimization
> might help here.
We can do that kind of testing (
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> My gcov attachment to PR19721 shows that the code does not
> trigger on amd64 either.
Hi Paolo and Steven,
I'm still reading through the patch, but I think the wider issue
of using profiling to determine which of GCC's transformations are
worthwhile
