Re: [RFC] md reorg plans for 4.6?

2009-10-31 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Saturday, October 31, 2009, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org writes: - there's also M68HC11 and SH... well, I doubt there will be volunteers. But note that, e.g., bt-load.c looks like a generic file but is actually SH specific, so moving it into

[RFC] md reorg plans for 4.6?

2009-10-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Hi all, with the new plugin infrastructure, it makes sense to replace the one-catches-all md reorg pass with target-specific passes plugged into the pass manager. If the md reorg is doing just complex peephole optimizations that cannot be achieved with targets, that's fine. This has the

Re: [RFC] md reorg plans for 4.6?

2009-10-30 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org writes: with the new plugin infrastructure, it makes sense to replace the one-catches-all md reorg pass with target-specific passes plugged into the pass manager. Yes, please. - there's also M68HC11 and SH... well, I doubt there will be volunteers. But note