On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>> > we've noticed that the loop optimizer sometimes inserts weirdly
>> > inefficient code to compute the value of an induction variable
>> > at the end of t
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > we've noticed that the loop optimizer sometimes inserts weirdly
> > inefficient code to compute the value of an induction variable
> > at the end of the loop.
[snip]
> The issue is that (start + 1) + 1 * (int) .
