Re: [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-09-10 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Tue, 2013-09-10 12:01:34 +1200, Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@kugelworks.com wrote: On 7/09/2013, at 1:31 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: This however still seems to have issues in a current build: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/showlog.php?id=10520mode=view Mn10300-linux does not

Re: [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-09-09 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
On 7/09/2013, at 1:31 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, thanks for cathing this. I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not

Re: [ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-09-06 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, thanks for cathing this. I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets that do not include

Re: [ping^2] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-09-03 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, David Edelsohn wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote: Hi! On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote:

[ping^2] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-09-02 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote: I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h.

Re: [ping^2] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-09-02 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote: Hi! On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote: I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not

[ping] [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-08-26 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, thanks for cathing this. I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and

Re: [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-08-20 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
Hi, thanks for cathing this. I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. diff --git

[buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-08-19 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! My build robot[1] catched this error[2] while cross-building for powerpc64le-linux: g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic