Re: [libstdc++] dg-require-atomic-builtins on ARM

2015-09-01 Thread Andreas Schwab
Sebastian Huber writes: > Thanks for this hint. Do you know the magic to use more than one machine > option, e.g. -march=armv7-a -mthumb? RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix\{,-march=armv7-a/-mthumb\} Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970

Re: [libstdc++] dg-require-atomic-builtins on ARM

2015-09-01 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 01/09/15 14:22, Andreas Schwab wrote: Sebastian Huber writes: How do the other ARM testers tackle this issue? Would it be possible to add for example a "-march=armv7-a" option if the target selector contains "arm"? RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix\{,-march=armv7-a\} Thanks for this hin

Re: [libstdc++] dg-require-atomic-builtins on ARM

2015-09-01 Thread Andreas Schwab
Sebastian Huber writes: > How do the other ARM testers tackle this issue? Would it be possible to > add for example a "-march=armv7-a" option if the target selector contains > "arm"? RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix\{,-march=armv7-a\} Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG

[libstdc++] dg-require-atomic-builtins on ARM

2015-09-01 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, I would like to run as many tests as possible on the arm-rtems target. Unfortunately about 100 tests use this: // { dg-require-atomic-builtins "" } Which uses a function check_v3_target_atomic_builtins in libstdc++.exp, which uses this program to determine if the atomic builtins are a