On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:34:39PM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 02/04/07, Ching, Jimen (US SSA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Therefore, only -Wswitch is enabled by -Wall but neither of
> >> Wswitch-default or Wswitch-enum are.
> >
> >Note; a bunch of -W options has the sentence "This
On 02/04/07, Ching, Jimen (US SSA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore, only -Wswitch is enabled by -Wall but neither of
> Wswitch-default or Wswitch-enum are.
Note; a bunch of -W options has the sentence "This warning is enabled by -Wall".
But there are a few that doesn't, but they are in t
> Therefore, only -Wswitch is enabled by -Wall but neither of
> Wswitch-default or Wswitch-enum are.
The statement for -Wall says:
-Wall
All of the above `-W' options combined. This enables all the warnings about
constructions that some users consider questionable, and that are easy to avoi
On 30/03/07, Ching, Jimen (US SSA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm using g++ 4.1.1 under Fedora Core 5 in an X86 system.
I read the GCC manual and it says -Wall includes the -Wswitch-enum
and -Wswitch-default warnings. But I had to supply these command
line options explicitly
Hi,
I'm using g++ 4.1.1 under Fedora Core 5 in an X86 system.
I read the GCC manual and it says -Wall includes the -Wswitch-enum
and -Wswitch-default warnings. But I had to supply these command
line options explicitly before the warnings are generated. Is the
manual wrong or is there a b
