I've had a gcj bug report saying that some CNI code has ceased to work
on PPC 32, but I'm not sure that this is a gcj bug at all. The bug is
that gcj and g++ no longer have comptabile class layout -- members are
at different offsets.
If you run the appended code with g++ version 3.4.1, you get
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:07:49PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I've had a gcj bug report saying that some CNI code has ceased to work
> on PPC 32, but I'm not sure that this is a gcj bug at all. The bug is
> that gcj and g++ no longer have comptabile class layout -- members are
> at different off
Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> public:
> long long __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__( ::java::lang::Object
l;
I don't recall the exact details, but I have fixed a couple of bugs about
the use of __alignof__ and attribute aligned on members of classes (maybe
templates only?). Ar
Joe Buck writes:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:07:49PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > I've had a gcj bug report saying that some CNI code has ceased to work
> > on PPC 32, but I'm not sure that this is a gcj bug at all. The bug is
> > that gcj and g++ no longer have comptabile class layout -- m
Giovanni Bajo writes:
> Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > public:
> > long long __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__( ::java::lang::Object
> l;
>
> I don't recall the exact details, but I have fixed a couple of bugs about
> the use of __alignof__ and attribute aligned on
Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > public:
> > > long long __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__(
::java::lang::Object
> > l;
> >
> > I don't recall the exact details, but I have fixed a couple of bugs
about
> > the use of __alignof__ and attribute aligned on members of classe
Giovanni Bajo writes:
> Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > public:
> > > > long long __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__( ::java::lang::Object
> > l;
> > >
> > > I don't recall the exact details, but I have fixed a couple of
> > > bugs about the use of __alignof_
On Apr 4, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Giovanni Bajo writes:
Is __alignof__( ::java::lang::Object ) the same under 3.4 and 4.0 in
the
first place?
Yes, 4 in both cases.
And here is the most reduced testcase (and it shows that the C and C++
front-ends don't agree any more which is bad):
#
On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Giovanni Bajo writes:
Is __alignof__( ::java::lang::Object ) the same under 3.4 and 4.0 in
the
first place?
Yes, 4 in both cases.
And here is the most reduced testcase (and it shows that the C and C++
