On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:49:00 +
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > [...]
> No, this shouldn't be happening unless a) you are doing something
> wrong; b) the options you are supplying to the compiler/linker are
> suggesting some sort of stubs are necessary.
It was case a), an option left in the mak
This message is really off topic for this list, please direct any
follow-ups to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org.
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 19:53 +1100, Zoltán Kócsi wrote:
> I have a question with regards to ARM interworking. The target is
> ARM7TDMI-S, embedded system with no OS. The compiler is arm-elf-gcc,
>
Zoltán Kócsi wrote:
> I have a question with regards to ARM interworking. The target is
> ARM7TDMI-S, embedded system with no OS. The compiler is arm-elf-gcc,
> 4.3.1 with binutils maybe 3 months old.
>
> It seems that when interworking is enabled then when a piece of THUMB
> code calls an other p
I have a question with regards to ARM interworking. The target is
ARM7TDMI-S, embedded system with no OS. The compiler is arm-elf-gcc,
4.3.1 with binutils maybe 3 months old.
It seems that when interworking is enabled then when a piece of THUMB
code calls an other piece of THUMB code in a separate
