About implementing new intrinsic

2007-02-14 Thread Ferad Zyulkyarov
Hi, I try to introduce a new intrinsic in gcc's back-end, for the alpha machines. In doing that, I referenced to the implementaions of altivec intrinsics for the PowerPC. In the mean time I noticed that the gcc-4.0 and gcc-4.1 implements these in different way which confused me. The difference is

Re: About implementing new intrinsic

2007-02-18 Thread Revital1 Eres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 14/02/2007 19:34:48: > Hi, > > I try to introduce a new intrinsic in gcc's back-end, for the alpha > machines. In doing that, I referenced to the implementaions of altivec > intrinsics for the PowerPC. In the mean time I noticed that the > gcc-4.0 and gcc-4.1 implements

Re: About implementing new intrinsic

2007-02-18 Thread Ferad Zyulkyarov
Hi, I am not sure if this message is still relevant. Anyhow, I think following another built-in under zero_arg_builtins ("__builtin_alpha_rpcc" in alpha.c for example) could help in finding the missing part in this implementation. the message is still relevant. I tried to use as example the

Re: About implementing new intrinsic

2007-02-18 Thread Revital1 Eres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/02/2007 17:01:31: > Hi, > > > > > I am not sure if this message is still relevant. Anyhow, I think > > following another built-in under zero_arg_builtins ("__builtin_alpha_rpcc" > > in alpha.c for example) could help in finding the missing part in this > > implemen

Re: About implementing new intrinsic

2007-02-21 Thread Revital1 Eres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/02/2007 17:01:31: > Hi, > > > > > I am not sure if this message is still relevant. Anyhow, I think > > following another built-in under zero_arg_builtins ("__builtin_alpha_rpcc" > > in alpha.c for example) could help in finding the missing part in this > > implemen