I'm currently porting a plug-in that used to target the 4.3.0-based
plug-in branch to the new top-of-tree plug-in system. I'm really
stymied by a bug whose source I just cannot track down! Usually that
means there is an error in my code, but the problem seems to involve
tree-ssa-dse.c and tree-ss
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Justin Seyster wrote:
> I'm currently porting a plug-in that used to target the 4.3.0-based
> plug-in branch to the new top-of-tree plug-in system. I'm really
> stymied by a bug whose source I just cannot track down! Usually that
> means there is an error in my
Thanks a lot for the help! It looks like creating a temporary
took care of it.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> I think the call you insert is not of valid gimple form - an address
> argument has to fulfill the is_gimple_min_invariant() predicate.
> Thus I suspect you h
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Justin Seyster wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the help! It looks like creating a temporary
> took care of it.
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> I think the call you insert is not of valid gimple form - an address
>> argument has to fulf
You're right: that was exactly the difference. It turns out I was
setting the third and fourth operands in the ARRAY_REF to what I
thought were sensible values. Setting them to NULL instead made the
ADDR_EXPR satisfy is_gimple_min_invariant() and fixed the whole mess.
Thanks again for looking at
