Nils Pipenbrinck wrote:
> Cygwin comes with a GCC 3.4.somewhat out of the box. To compile MPFR you
> need a 4.1 compiler. So you have to double compiling everything. And
I don't know where you get that assertion but it's not true. mpfr built
with gcc 3.4 works just fine and passes all tests in
On 2008-10-15 04:45:25 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2008-10-14 14:19:22 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nils Pipenbrinck
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Cygwin comes with a GCC 3.4.somewhat out of the box. To compile
> > > MPFR you need a 4.1 compiler. So
On 2008-10-14 14:19:22 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nils Pipenbrinck
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cygwin comes with a GCC 3.4.somewhat out of the box. To compile
> > MPFR you need a 4.1 compiler. So you have to double compiling
> > everything. And worse: You ha
Nils Pipenbrinck wrote on 14 October 2008 21:29:
> Markus Milleder wrote:
>> I don't think anybody who tries to build GCC from source will have any
>> problem building MPFR first.
>>
> Not entirely true:
>
> Those of us who use cygwin and want to use the latest GCC have to first
> compile a non
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nils Pipenbrinck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cygwin comes with a GCC 3.4.somewhat out of the box. To compile MPFR you
> need a 4.1 compiler. So you have to double compiling everything. And worse:
> You have to know that you have to do this. There is no information
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Nils Pipenbrinck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not entirely true:
Those of us who use cygwin and want to use the latest GCC have to first
compile a non MPFR GCC (e.g. 4.1.x) before they can compile the latest GPFR
and link GCC to it.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Nils Pipenbrinck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not entirely true:
>
> Those of us who use cygwin and want to use the latest GCC have to first
> compile a non MPFR GCC (e.g. 4.1.x) before they can compile the latest GPFR
> and link GCC to it.
I don't really see any
Markus Milleder wrote:
I don't think anybody who tries to build GCC from source will have any
problem building MPFR first.
Not entirely true:
Those of us who use cygwin and want to use the latest GCC have to first
compile a non MPFR GCC (e.g. 4.1.x) before they can compile the latest
GPFR
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:23:48PM +0200, Markus Milleder wrote:
> Adrian Bunk schrieb am 13.10.2008 17:41:15:
>...
> > And upgrading from 2.3.1 to let's say 3.0.0 might be a bad choice if
> > the new version contains regressions.
>
> That's why I said "before branching", this gives a time window
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:23:48PM +0200, Markus Milleder wrote:
> Much harder ?
>
> I don't think anybody who tries to build GCC from source will have any
> problem building MPFR first.
It is certainly an awkward annoyance, especially when you occassionally
need to build gcc on many different bo
Adrian Bunk schrieb am 13.10.2008 17:41:15:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:42:08PM +0200, Markus Milleder wrote:
> > Is there any reason not to demand 2.3.2 for GCC 4.4 ? Or even the
> newest MPFR version published before creating the GCC 4.4 release
> branch (which could be 2.3.3) ?
>
> Upgrading
11 matches
Mail list logo
